POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri House Bill 2127 Requires p53 Tests on Abnormal Endometrial Samples for Uterine Cancer Diagnosis

Original title: TESTING FOR DIAGNOSIS OF UTERINE CANCER

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Rudy Veit

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Missouri House Bill 2127, known as 'Cindi's Law', requires that a be performed on all abnormal s to diagnose and treat uterine cancer.

Why it matters

Patients undergoing evaluation for abnormal uterine tissue will automatically receive an additional diagnostic marker test to evaluate cancer severity and prognosis.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

healthcare providers

Medical professionals and laboratories must perform an additional p53 test on all abnormal cytological or histological endometrial samples.

Directly affected

patients undergoing uterine cancer diagnosis

Patients receiving evaluations for abnormal uterine tissue will automatically have a p53 protein abnormality test included in their diagnostic process.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Cindi's Law require for uterine cancer testing?
It requires that a be performed on all abnormal s for the diagnosis and treatment of uterine cancer.
Does the p53 test replace other diagnostic tests?
No, the must be conducted in addition to any other tests performed on the abnormal sample.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 2, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly, Rudy Veit
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonRudy Veit“Representative who introduced House Bill 2127”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record