Rules for Moving Money from City-Owned Utilities to General Funds
December 15, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently dead. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
6 actions- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 5, 2026HouseNow in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 5, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Commerce Committee
- Jan 5, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
- Jan 5, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Dec 15, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
If enacted, this bill would restrict how cities manage their utility revenues, potentially forcing changes to local budget structures and requiring cities to choose between using utility profits for general services or maintaining eligibility for state infrastructure grants.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Municipalities
They must comply with new transfer caps, disclosure requirements, and restrictions on the use of utility earnings.
Utility Customers
They are required to vote in local referendums to establish or reestablish the percentage of utility earnings transferred to the general fund.
Last recorded activity December 15, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a city use utility profits to pay for general city services like parks or police?
What happens if a city ignores these rules?
Can the 10% transfer limit be bypassed in an emergency?
Why It Matters
If enacted, this bill would restrict how cities manage their utility revenues, potentially forcing changes to local budget structures and requiring cities to choose between using utility profits for general services or maintaining eligibility for state infrastructure grants.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
on behalf of East Bay Municipal Utility District
Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP
on behalf of East Bay Municipal Utility District
ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP
on behalf of CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OFFICE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DBA CITY WATER, LIGHT AND POWER
ELECTUS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
on behalf of TOWN OF CLAYTON, NC
CITY OF SANTA CLARA
RJL SOLUTIONS
on behalf of CITY OF TERRE HAUTE
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Utility Revenue Decoupling
The bill attempts to strictly separate utility operations from general municipal governance, effectively treating city-owned utilities as independent financial entities.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools