POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Pennsylvania House Bill 392 Requires Insurers to Provide Written Notice and Fraud Disclosures When Reimbursing Policyholders Directly for Out-of-Network EMS Claims

Original title: An Act amending the act of May 17, 1921 (P.L.682, No.284), known as The Insurance Company Law of 1921, in casualty insurance, further providing for billing.

Last action · January 28, 2025: Referred to INSURANCE, Jan. 28, 2025Sponsors: GROVE and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania insurers must now include specific written notifications, itemized claim details, and an insurance fraud disclosure warning whenever they send out-of-network emergency medical service reimbursement payments directly to s, effective 60 days after enactment.

Why it matters

s who receive direct insurance payouts for out-of-network emergency medical care must use the funds solely to pay the ambulance provider or risk facing an insurance fraud investigation.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

insurance policyholders

Policyholders receiving direct reimbursements for out-of-network emergency medical services must receive written disclosures and face fraud liability if funds are not used to pay the EMS provider.

Directly affected

nonnetwork EMS agencies

Out-of-network emergency medical service agencies receive monthly notifications when insurers issue direct payments to policyholders for their services.

Directly affected

insurers

Insurers must modify their direct-to-policyholder reimbursement communications to include itemized claim data, specific fraud warnings, and monthly notices to out-of-network EMS providers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a policyholder uses an out-of-network EMS reimbursement check for something other than paying the ambulance bill?
The disclosure required by the bill warns that using the funds for any purpose other than satisfying the emergency medical services liability may result in an insurance fraud claim.
Are ambulance providers notified when a policyholder is paid directly?
Yes, insurers must notify the monthly that a claim payment has been issued to the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 28, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to INSURANCE, Jan. 28, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

The Insurance Company Law of 1921
otherThe Insurance Company Law of 1921“Act being amended by House Bill 392”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record