POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HB 421FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026dead

New Annual Performance Reports for Florida Judges

Original title: Performance Reports of Circuit and County Court Judges

November 13, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Currently dead. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.

Last action
Died in Civil Justice & Claims SubcommitteeMar 13, 2026
Lead sponsor

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
  2. Nov 18, 2025House
    Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
  3. Nov 18, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary Committee
  4. Nov 18, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Justice Budget Subcommittee
  5. Nov 18, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
  6. Nov 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

Residents will gain public access to standardized efficiency data for local judges, including how long cases remain pending and how quickly hearings are scheduled, starting with data from the 2028 calendar year.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Circuit and county court judges

Judges are subject to annual performance reporting and may choose to submit explanatory statements for their metrics.

Clerks of the circuit court

Clerks are required to compile, prepare, and maintain the annual performance reports on their websites.

What changed

Last recorded activity November 13, 2025.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill requires clerks of the to publish annual performance reports for every circuit and judge, detailing case loads, s, and case processing times. Judges are permitted to provide an explanatory statement for their metrics, which will be posted alongside the report if approved by the Chief Judge.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What information will be included in the judge performance reports?
The reports will detail the number of cases assigned, cases reaching , s, average age of pending cases, number of civil cases pending for 3 years or more, and the average time between scheduling and holding a hearing.
Can a judge respond to the data in their report?
Yes, a judge may prepare an explanatory statement regarding extenuating circumstances, which will be posted with the report if approved by the Chief Judge.
When will these reports first be available to the public?
The first reporting period covers the 2028 calendar year, with reports due to be posted by April 1 of the following year.

Why It Matters

Residents will gain public access to standardized efficiency data for local judges, including how long cases remain pending and how quickly hearings are scheduled, starting with data from the 2028 calendar year.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Judicial Performance Transparency

The bill represents a shift toward standardized, public-facing performance metrics for the judiciary, moving away from internal court management toward public accountability.

Connected Entities

organizationCivil Justice & Claims SubcommitteeSubcommittee receiving the billMap →
personCircuit and County Court JudgesJudges subject to performance reportingMap →
organizationJudiciary CommitteeSubcommittee receiving the billMap →
organizationJustice Budget SubcommitteeSubcommittee receiving the billMap →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record