The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Georgia regulates vehicle value protection agreements, mandates consumer cancellation rights, and requires provider financial security
Last action · February 10, 2026: House Committee Favorably Reported By SubstituteSponsors: Martin Momtahan and 3 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Georgia HB 504 establishes comprehensive regulations for s by requiring providers to maintain financial security, granting consumers a mandatory 30-day with full refund rights, and prohibiting lenders from conditioning vehicle loans on the purchase of these agreements.
Vehicle purchasers gain mandatory cancellation rights, guaranteed refund terms, and direct recourse to insurers if providers fail to pay claims, while agreement providers must maintain at least $15 million in capital, funded reserves, or $100 million in net worth.
- The House Committee on Regulated Industries handles matters related to commercial practices, trade regulations, and industry oversight within the Georgia General Assembly. context
- The Fair Business Practices Act of 1975 serves as Georgia's primary consumer protection statute prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices in consumer transactions. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Consumers
Consumers gain statutory cancellation rights, a 30-day free look period, mandatory disclosures, and direct recourse to insurers if providers fail to pay claims.
Providers of vehicle value protection agreements
Providers must comply with new financial security mandates, maintain specific reserves or net worth, provide mandatory disclosures, and adhere to strict cancellation and refund rules.
Insurers
Insurers issuing policies backing vehicle value protection agreements must meet capital, surplus, and premium ratio standards and reimburse consumers if providers fail to perform.
Key Facts
- Establishes a mandatory free look period of at least 30 days for vehicle value protection agreements, allowing consumers to cancel for a full refund if no benefits have been provided.
- Prohibits finance agreements or vehicle purchase agreements from being conditioned on a consumer entering into a vehicle value protection agreement.
- Requires providers to ensure agreements are backed by a licensed insurer with at least $15 million in capital and surplus, or maintain funded reserves of at least 40 percent of net money received, or maintain a net worth of at least $100 million.
- Permits consumers to file a reimbursement claim directly with the insurer if the provider fails to pay within 60 days after proof of damage, total loss, or unrecovered theft.
Show all 8 facts
- Authorizes the Attorney General to bring civil actions to enjoin violations, obtain restitution, and impose civil penalties of up to $2,500 per violation.
- Classifies any violation of the article as a violation of the Fair Business Practices Act of 1975, restricted to public remedies administered by the Attorney General.
- Requires vehicle value protection agreements to conspicuously disclose provider contact information, terms, charges, benefit eligibility, and cancellation restrictions.
- Allows providers to cancel agreements immediately for nonpayment or breach of duties, while requiring five days written notice for cancellations for other reasons.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a car dealership force me to buy a vehicle value protection agreement to get a car loan?
What rights do I have if I want to cancel a vehicle value protection agreement after purchasing it?
What happens if the agreement provider fails to pay my claim after a total loss?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
6 actions- Feb 10, 2026HouseCommitteeHouse Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute
- Apr 4, 2025HouseHouse Withdrawn, Recommitted
- Mar 4, 2025HouseCommitteeHouse Committee Favorably Reported
- Feb 20, 2025HouseHouse Second Readers
- Feb 19, 2025HouseIntroducedHouse First Readers
- Feb 18, 2025HouseIntroducedHouse Hopper
Version history & redline
2 versions on fileLobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.ga.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
