Public Records Exemption for Appellate Court Clerks
October 24, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently dead. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
15 actions- Jan 29, 2026HouseIn Messages
- Jan 29, 2026SenateImmediately certified
- Jan 29, 2026SenateFloorPassed; YEAS 34 NAYS 1
- Jan 29, 2026SenateFloorRead 3rd time
- Jan 29, 2026SenateFloorRead 2nd time
- Jan 27, 2026SenatePlaced on Special Order Calendar, 01/29/26
Show 9 earlier actions
- Jan 27, 2026SenatePlaced on Calendar, on 2nd reading
- Jan 27, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by- Rules; YEAS 20 NAYS 2
- Jan 22, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Rules, 01/27/26, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
- Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced
- Dec 2, 2025SenateNow in Rules
- Dec 2, 2025SenateCommitteeFavorable by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 1
- Nov 24, 2025SenateOn Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 12/02/25, 1:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
- Nov 17, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Judiciary; Rules
- Oct 24, 2025SenateIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill aimed to shield specific court employees from public records requests, balancing government transparency with the personal safety of clerks who interact with litigants, though the measure ultimately did not become law.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Appellate court clerks
The bill would have granted them and their families a public records exemption for personal identifying information.
Public records requesters
They would have been restricted from accessing specific personal information of appellate court clerks that is currently subject to public records laws.
Last recorded activity October 24, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What information would have been protected under this bill?
Did this bill become law?
Who would have been considered an 'appellate court clerk' under this bill?
Why It Matters
The bill aimed to shield specific court employees from public records requests, balancing government transparency with the personal safety of clerks who interact with litigants, though the measure ultimately did not become law.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
43
Yes
36
No
1
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (43)
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · excused
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · no
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
+ 19 more
Favorable
Total
28
Yes
24
No
2
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (28)
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · other
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · other
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · no
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
+ 4 more
Favorable
Total
11
Yes
9
No
1
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (11)
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · other
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · no
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Judicial Privacy
The bill represents a trend in Florida legislation to extend public records exemptions to an increasingly wide range of court-related personnel.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools