POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah schedules specific kratom alkaloids and sets processor labeling rules

Original title: Kratom Revisions

Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsors: Evan Vickers and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill defines kratom processor requirements, establishes new restrictions on alkaloid concentrations, and classifies certain concentrated and synthetic compounds as s.

Why it matters

Processors distributing kratom products in Utah face new misdemeanor penalties and registration mandates if alkaloid levels exceed 2% or if packaging lacks specific mitragynine content labels.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

kratom processors

Kratom processors must comply with new labeling rules, alkaloid concentration limits, registration requirements, and face misdemeanor penalties for violations.

Directly affected

consumers

Consumers receive mandatory product labeling showing mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine levels and increased restrictions on synthetic or concentrated alkaloids.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a kratom processor fails to label product packaging?
A kratom processor who violates packaging or ingredient requirements is guilty of a class C misdemeanor for each violation.
What specific kratom substances are added to Schedule I?
The bill schedules synthetic and concentrated at a level greater than 0.4% of the total kratom alkaloid composition.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate.

Procedural history

20 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3nd Reading Calendar to Rules
  4. Jan 23, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  5. Jan 23, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  6. Jan 22, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
Show 14 earlier actions
  1. Jan 22, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  2. Jan 22, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  3. Jan 22, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  4. Jan 21, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  5. Jan 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  6. Jan 20, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  7. Jan 20, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0048
  8. Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  9. Jan 18, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0048
  10. Jan 7, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  11. Dec 23, 2025Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0048
  12. Dec 23, 2025Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0048
  13. Dec 23, 2025Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  14. Dec 23, 2025Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Stricter Alkaloid Thresholds for Kratom

The bill aligns state controlled substance schedules with specific concentration limits for 7-hydroxymitragynine and explicitly incorporates synthetic kratom derivatives.

Connected Entities

Division of Professional Licensing, Department of Agriculture and Food, Jake Sawyer and 2 more
OrganizationDivision of Professional Licensing“Division created in Section 58-1-103”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Agriculture and Food“State department responsible for registering kratom processors”Map →
PersonJake Sawyer“House Sponsor”Map →
PersonEvan J. Vickers“Chief Sponsor in the Senate”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Commerce“Defined as the department under the Utah Controlled Substances Act”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record