Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights (SB 2D)
April 29, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill creates new legal standards for AI transparency and data privacy, potentially impacting how residents interact with chatbots, how schools deploy AI in classrooms, and how companies can use an individual's name or image in AI-generated media.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Minors
Requires parental consent for chatbot accounts and mandates safety disclosures.
Parents
Granted rights to consent to chatbot use, access account activity, and opt out of AI instructional tools in schools.
AI Technology Companies
Subject to new data privacy, disclosure, and contracting requirements with potential civil penalties for violations.
Educational Entities
Must comply with grade-level restrictions, parental notice, and opt-out requirements for AI tools.
Governmental Entities
Prohibited from contracting with certain foreign-owned AI entities.
Last recorded activity April 29, 2026.
Introduced.
Background
- The bill was introduced in the 2026 legislative session and underwent a rapid committee process before dying in the Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my child use an AI chatbot?
What happens if a company uses my image in an AI-generated ad without my permission?
Can my school use AI tools in the classroom?
What is a 'foreign country of concern' in this context?
Why It Matters
The bill creates new legal standards for AI transparency and data privacy, potentially impacting how residents interact with chatbots, how schools deploy AI in classrooms, and how companies can use an individual's name or image in AI-generated media.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
ADOBE INC
2026
“IT Modernization and Digital Service delivery issues; Digital Service Delivery IT Acquisition, and Content Authenticity and digital provenance issues; Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI); artificial intelligence; content provenance; privacy; technology in and competition issues; AI innovation and the economy; Content provenance and AI Labelling; IT modernization; Support for H.R. 9112 - CREATOR Act”
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
40
Yes
37
No
1
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (40)
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · no
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
+ 16 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
AI-Specific Regulatory Framework
The bill marks a shift toward creating a dedicated 'Bill of Rights' for AI, moving beyond general consumer protection to specific mandates for chatbot design and school technology.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance90How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz75Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools