POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New York requires legislators to verbally disclose AI-generated speech before floor remarks

Original title: Relates to the disclosure of artificial intelligence use in floor statements and debate by members of the legislature

Last action · September 9, 2026: REFERRED TO RULESSponsor: Steve Chan

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

State senators and assembly members must verbally state a standard disclosure before speaking, reading statements, or entering comments into the official legislative record if those remarks were drafted in whole or in part by .

Why it matters

Legislators who fail to provide the required disclosure face an immediate and have their official remarks marked with a permanent digital watermark.

Background
  • Legislative rules govern how members debate bills, offer amendments, and enter statements into the official record during chamber sessions. context
  • The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence tools has prompted various legislative bodies to propose transparency and disclosure mandates for official communications. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

members of the state senate or state assembly

Legislators must verbally disclose the use of artificial intelligence before speaking and face official watermarking if they fail to comply.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a legislator fails to make the AI disclosure?
An immediate is raised, and the member's remarks are marked in the official record with a permanent digital watermark stating that the content lacks proven human origin.
What exact wording must legislators use for the disclosure?
Lawmakers must clearly and prominently state: 'The following remarks contain approximately (insert percentage) percent of or generated text. I hereby announce that these upcoming words are not the product of my own organic intellect, independent thought, or cognitive labor, but are instead derived from artificial intelligence sources.'

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Sep 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO RULES

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Introduction of AI Disclosure Rules in Legislative Debate

The bill establishes formal regulatory definitions for artificial intelligence and generative artificial intelligence within the New York legislative law to govern floor statements.

Connected Entities

Steve Chan
PersonSteve Chan“New York State Senator for District 17 who introduced bill S 10692”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.nysenate.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment30
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record