The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas restricts transportation department from blocking property access through highway rights-of-way
Last action · May 5, 2025: Referred to TransportationSponsor: Carl Tepper
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
The Texas Department of Transportation is prohibited from restricting property owners or lessees from accessing land adjacent to a , provided the property had legal roadway access and was acquired before the department took authority over the right-of-way.
Property owners and lessees with land bordering certain state highways retain guaranteed entry to their parcels without interference from state transportation officials, unless the state formally acquires the property interest through purchase or .
- The Texas Department of Transportation manages state highways and oversees right-of-way acquisitions and access regulations across Texas. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Property owners and lessees
Their legal ability to access property adjacent to highway rights-of-way is protected from restriction by the state transportation department under specified historical conditions.
Texas Department of Transportation
The department is prohibited from restricting access to certain pre-existing adjacent properties unless it acquires the property interest through purchase or condemnation.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does this bill protect?
Does the state still have the right to acquire the property?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
27 actions- May 5, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Transportation
- May 5, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time
- Apr 29, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- Apr 29, 2025HouseReported engrossed
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#727)
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorPassed
Show 21 earlier actions
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- Apr 28, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 28, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#618)
- Apr 28, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment
- Apr 28, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- Apr 25, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- Apr 22, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- Apr 16, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- Apr 15, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- Apr 15, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Apr 9, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably as substituted
- Apr 9, 2025HouseCommittee substitute considered in committee
- Apr 9, 2025HouseConsidered in formal meeting
- Apr 3, 2025HouseLeft pending in committee
- Apr 3, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Apr 3, 2025HouseCommittee substitute considered in committee
- Apr 3, 2025HouseConsidered in public hearing
- Apr 3, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Mar 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Transportation
- Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Jan 2, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
HB 1722 was passed
Total
142
- Yes
- 141
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (142)
118 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
CSHB 1722 was passed to engrossment
Total
144
- Yes
- 139
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 3
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 1
How they voted (144)
120 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
