POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas HB 2685 Establishes Personal Civil Liability for Public Officials Who Violate Constitutional Rights

Original title: AN ACT concerning public officials; enacting the public official accountability act; providing that public officials are personally liable for actions that violate constitutional rights or exceed such official's lawful duties.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in CommitteeSponsor: Bill Rhiley

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The Public Official Accountability Act makes state, county, and local public officials personally liable in civil court for actions that violate constitutional rights or exceed their lawful duties, while prohibiting public entities from ing officials found liable with malice. The measure establishes a two-year statute of limitations for filing claims and caps punitive damages at three times compensatory damages or $500,000, whichever is greater.

Why it matters

The measure alters legal accountability by removing traditional immunity defenses for state and local officials, opening them to personal financial damages for unconstitutional actions while preserving core judicial and legislative immunities.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public Officials

Elected or appointed state and local officers and employees lose traditional qualified and sovereign immunity defenses and face personal financial liability for knowing or reckless unconstitutional actions.

Directly affected

Public Entities

State, county, and city governments are restricted from indemnifying officials found liable under the act, except for compensatory damages when the official acted without malice.

Directly affected

Civil Litigants

Individuals who experience constitutional violations or abuse of office gain a new state-level cause of action to seek compensatory and punitive damages, attorney fees, and court costs.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who qualifies as a public official under this act?
A public official includes any elected or appointed officer, employee, or agent of the state, county, city, or other political subdivision acting in an official capacity, specifically including law enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges, legislators, and administrative personnel.
Can public entities pay the damages if an official is found liable?
Public entities may not officials found liable under this act, with the sole exception of covering compensatory damages if the official acted without malice.
What standard of proof is required to establish liability?
Liability attaches only if the plaintiff proves by a that the official's conduct was knowing, willful, or in reckless disregard of the law, rather than a good-faith error in judgment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026House
    Died in Committee
  2. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Federal and State Affairs

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Kansas, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
locationKansas“State where the legislation was introduced and enacted.”Map →
other42 U.S.C. § 1983“Federal statute for claims regarding the deprivation of constitutional rights.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record