POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALcongressional record
High Impact

Proposed Rules for Foreign Ownership of U.S. Agricultural Land

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6103

June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

If enacted, this amendment would grant the federal government new powers to block or force the abandonment of agricultural land sales and leases to foreign entities from designated adversary nations, impacting real estate transactions and agricultural business control.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Foreign investors from adversary nations

These entities face new restrictions and potential prohibitions on purchasing or leasing agricultural land near sensitive U.S. sites.

U.S. agricultural landowners

These individuals or entities may face limitations on who they can sell or lease their land to if the property is near sensitive government facilities.

Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States

The committee is granted expanded review authority and must incorporate the Secretary of Agriculture into its proceedings.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 24, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Senate Amendment 6103 proposes new oversight and potential prohibitions on foreign entities from certain countries purchasing or leasing U.S. agricultural land near sensitive government or military sites. The amendment would expand the authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States () to review these transactions and requires the President to block deals involving 'covered foreign persons' from specific adversary nations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this affect land owned by U.S. citizens?
No, the amendment explicitly states that its provisions do not apply to the acquisition of agricultural land by U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.
Which countries are considered 'covered countries' under this proposal?
The proposal identifies the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea as covered countries.
Can the President allow a transaction that would otherwise be prohibited?
Yes, the President may waive the prohibition on a case-by-case basis if they determine the transaction is in the national interest of the United States.

Why It Matters

If enacted, this amendment would grant the federal government new powers to block or force the abandonment of agricultural land sales and leases to foreign entities from designated adversary nations, impacting real estate transactions and agricultural business control.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Expansion of CFIUS Scope

The amendment marks a shift by formally integrating the Secretary of Agriculture into the CFIUS review process for land and biotechnology transactions.

Connected Entities

personMs. Cortez MastoU.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.Map →
locationRussian FederationDesignated as a 'covered country' under the proposed rules.Map →
locationDemocratic People's Republic of KoreaDesignated as a 'covered country' under the proposed rules.Map →
locationIslamic Republic of IranDesignated as a 'covered country' under the proposed rules.Map →
personMs. LummisU.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.Map →
personMr. RoundsU.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.Map →
organizationCommittee on Foreign Investment in the United StatesThe federal committee responsible for reviewing foreign investments for nationalMap →
locationPeople's Republic of ChinaDesignated as a 'covered country' under the proposed rules.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record