POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Vermont Requests Recommendations to Increase Family Forensic Evaluators in Child Welfare Cases

Original title: An act relating to family forensic evaluators

Last action · January 15, 2025: Read first time and referred to the Committee on JudiciarySponsors: Ian Goodnow and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The General Assembly requests the Chief Superior Judge, , and Vermont Psychological Association to recommend strategies by November 1, 2025, for increasing family forensic evaluator availability in complex family court cases.

Why it matters

A shortage of specialized mental health professionals currently delays court resolution in child welfare and parenting disputes, affecting how families navigate the Family Division of the Superior Court.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Chief Superior Judge

Must collaborate with state and professional offices to examine evaluator needs and submit recommendations to the General Assembly.

Directly affected

Office of Professional Regulation

The Director is asked to participate in examining barriers and strategies regarding family forensic evaluators.

Directly affected

Vermont Psychological Association

The Executive Director is asked to help examine evaluator availability and submit recommendations.

Key Facts

  • The General Assembly asks the Chief Superior Judge, Office of Professional Regulation, and Vermont Psychological Association to collaborate on evaluator availability.
  • The collaborative study must examine the need for and geographic distribution of family forensic evaluators in complex parental rights cases.
  • The study must evaluate barriers to increasing evaluator numbers and determine if ethical complaint protections are warranted.
  • Recommendations must be submitted to the General Assembly on or before November 1, 2025.
Show all 5 facts
  • The act takes effect upon passage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main goal of House Bill 36?
The bill requests specific judicial and professional entities to study the shortage of and provide recommendations to increase their availability in complex child welfare cases.
Who is required to collaborate on these recommendations?
The Chief Superior Judge, the Director of the , and the Executive Director of the Vermont Psychological Association.
When are the recommendations due?
On or before November 1, 2025.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 15, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Ian Goodnow, Martin LaLonde, Vermont Psychological Association and 4 more
PersonIan Goodnow“Representative from Brattleboro”Map →
PersonMartin LaLonde“Representative from South Burlington”Map →
OrganizationVermont Psychological Association“Association tasked with making recommendations”Map →
locationVermont“State jurisdiction”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Professional Regulation“State office tasked with making recommendations”Map →
OrganizationSuperior Court“Court housing the Family Division”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Vermont state legislature receiving the report”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.vermont.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance25
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record