POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey Bill A828 Authorizes Remote Meeting Participation for Active Duty Military Officials

Original title: Allows individuals on active duty to participate remotely in certain governmental meetings.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Military and Veterans' Affairs CommitteeSponsor: Gerry Scharfenberger

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey bill A828 allows municipal governing body members, county commissioners, school board members, and state-level board or commission members serving on in the U.S. Armed Forces to participate remotely in official meetings and count toward meeting s.

Why it matters

Ensures elected and appointed officials called to military service can maintain their voting rights and governance duties without forfeiting their official positions.

Background
  • The New Jersey General Assembly is the lower house of the New Jersey Legislature. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Active-duty military officials serving on local or state boards

Active-duty members are permitted to participate remotely in official meetings and count toward meeting quorums.

Directly affected

Municipal, county, and school board bodies

Governing bodies are granted the option to pass resolutions allowing active-duty members to participate remotely.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to participate remotely under this bill?
Elected and appointed officials—including municipal governing body members, county commissioners, school board members, and members of State boards, commissions, committees, or task forces—who are serving on in the U.S. Armed Forces are eligible.
Does remote participation count toward establishing a quorum?
Yes, active-duty members participating remotely are officially included in establishing a for their respective meetings.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Military and Veterans' Affairs Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Standardization of Remote Military Participation

The bill creates a uniform mechanism across municipal, county, school board, and state executive entities to accommodate active-duty military officials.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Division of Local Government Services, Department of Community Affairs and 3 more
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body introducing and reviewing the bill”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Local Government Services“Division within the Department of Community Affairs authorized to develop guidel”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Community Affairs“Department required to publish guidelines on its website”Map →
OrganizationOffice of School Ethics and Compliance“Office within the Department of Education authorized to develop guidelines and p”Map →
PersonGerry Scharfenberger“Assemblyman sponsoring the bill representing District 13”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Education“Department required to publish school board guidelines on its website”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance50
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record