POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho Legislature expands child neglect definition and state intervention criteria

Original title: CHILD PROTECTION – Amends existing law to revise the definition of “neglected.”

Last action · February 17, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

CHILD PROTECTION – Amends existing law to revise the definition of “neglected.”

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Parents and Guardians

Subject to updated legal standards and definitions governing child custody, care requirements, and protective proceedings.

Directly affected

Department of Health and Welfare

Must apply the revised statutory definitions when investigating allegations of child neglect and managing protective cases.

Directly affected

Children

Subject to the revised legal thresholds governing state intervention, protective supervision, and custody determinations.

Key Facts

  • House Bill 691 amends Section 16-1602, Idaho Code, to revise the definition of a neglected child.
  • Neglected child criteria now include acts or omissions by a custodian resulting in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, or exploitation.
  • Neglect includes any act or failure to act presenting an imminent risk of serious harm to a child.
  • Neglect applies when a parent or custodian is unable to discharge responsibilities, leaving the child lacking necessary care and having suffered or likely to suffer serious harm.
Show all 8 facts
  • Placement of a child for care or adoption in violation of law constitutes neglect.
  • Failure to comply with educational requirements under Section 33-202, Idaho Code, is classified as neglect.
  • Parents choosing a second opinion regarding medical treatment are explicitly protected from having their child deemed neglected solely for that reason.
  • Parents choosing treatment by spiritual means alone in lieu of medical treatment are protected from having their child deemed neglected solely for that reason.

Frequently Asked Questions

What changes under the revised definition of child neglect?
The bill updates statutory language to explicitly list conditions such as recent acts or omissions resulting in serious harm, imminent risk of harm, parental inability to provide necessary care, unlawful adoption placements, and educational noncompliance.
Does seeking a second medical opinion qualify as neglect under this bill?
No. The text explicitly states that a parent or guardian choosing a second opinion or further information regarding medical treatment shall not be deemed neglected for that reason alone.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 17, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration
  2. Feb 16, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

JUDICIARY, RULES AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
OrganizationJUDICIARY, RULES AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE“Committee that introduced House Bill 691”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record