POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofLabor →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts Bill S.1301 extends enforcement rights to employee personnel record rebuttals

Original title: An Act protecting an employee's right to rebuttal of personnel records

Last action · October 2, 2025: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and MeansSponsor: Sal DiDomenico

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts bill S.1301 amends state labor law to allow employees to enforce their right to rebut personnel records through existing wage and hour complaint mechanisms. The measure incorporates Section 52C personnel record provisions into broader enforcement statutes under Chapter 149 of the .

Why it matters

Workers gain direct statutory avenues to challenge inaccurate information in their personnel files by linking record rebuttal rights to established labor violation dispute processes.

Background
  • Section 52C of Chapter 149 of the Massachusetts General Laws governs employee personnel records and outlines an employee's right to review and correct or dispute information contained within them. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employees

Workers gain formal enforcement avenues under Chapter 149 to address issues related to their personnel records.

Directly affected

Employers

Employers face statutory enforcement mechanisms regarding how personnel records and employee rebuttals are handled under labor law.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Bill S.1301 change for employees?
It ensures that an employee's right to rebut or dispute items in their personnel records is formally tied to existing statutory enforcement mechanisms under Chapter 149.
Which specific sections of the General Laws are updated?
The bill updates Section 148A and Section 150 of Chapter 149 of the Massachusetts .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Oct 2, 2025SenateCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means
  2. Jul 9, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 07/15/2025 from 10:30 AM-01:00 PM in B-2
  3. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
  4. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Labor and Workforce Development

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Integration of Personnel Record Enforcement

The bill bridges Section 52C personnel record rules with the broader enforcement framework of Sections 148A and 150 of Chapter 149.

Connected Entities

Massachusetts, Sal DiDomenico
locationMassachusetts“Jurisdiction of the General Laws”Map →
PersonSal DiDomenico“Primary sponsor of Senate No. 1301”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record