POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho House Bill 699 authorizes courts to order attorney's fees in contested divorce and child custody cases for parties lacking financial resources

Original title: DOMESTIC RELATIONS – Amends existing law to provide for attorney’s fees for parties that lack financial resources in divorce or child custody matters.

Last action · February 17, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

DOMESTIC RELATIONS – Amends existing law to provide for attorney’s fees for parties that lack financial resources in divorce or child custody matters.

Why it matters

Low-income litigants in contested family law disputes gain a formal mechanism to petitioning courts for financial assistance covering legal representation and court costs from the opposing party. The legislation caps the required payment so that the paying party cannot be ordered to disburse more than the amount of their own attorney's fees, while also establishing penalties including fee liability for frivolous or harassing fee motions.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

parties in contested divorce or child custody matters

Litigants gain the right to receive court advisements about legal representation and to petition for opposing party assistance with attorney's fees and litigation costs.

Directly affected

minor or dependent children

Children may have an attorney or guardian ad litem appointed by the court to represent their interests regarding support, custody, and visitation.

Directly affected

counties in Idaho

County governments must bear the costs, fees, and disbursements of a child's court-appointed attorney or guardian ad litem if both parents are found to be indigent.

Key Facts

  • The court must advise both parties at the initial hearing in a contested divorce or child custody matter that each party would be best served by consulting an attorney and may request the court to order the other party to assist in paying attorney's fees and costs.
  • A party may file a motion for attorney's fees and cost assistance if legal representation cannot be obtained because of a lack of financial resources.
  • When a fee request is made, the court must consider the sworn financial resources of both parties, including expected third-party contributions, and enter a written decision.
  • The party ordered to pay attorney's fees and costs shall not be required to pay more than that party's own attorney's fees.
Show all 6 facts
  • The court may order attorney's fees to be paid to the nonmoving party by the moving party if the court finds the motion for fees was made frivolously, to harass, or to delay.
  • The court may appoint an attorney or guardian ad litem for a minor or dependent child, with costs assessed against either or both parents, or borne by the county if both parties are indigent.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I request help paying for an attorney in a contested divorce?
Yes. Under the bill, a party in a contested divorce or child custody matter may make a motion for attorney's fees and cost assistance if they contend that legal representation cannot be obtained due to a lack of financial resources.
Is there a limit to how much the paying party can be ordered to pay?
Yes. The party paying the fees and costs shall not be ordered to pay more than that party's own attorney's fees.
What happens if someone files a frivolous motion for attorney's fees?
The court may order attorney's fees to be paid to the nonmoving party by the moving party if the court finds the motion was made frivolously, to harass the nonmoving party, or to delay the proceeding.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 17, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration
  2. Feb 16, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

JUDICIARY, RULES AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
OrganizationJUDICIARY, RULES AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE“House committee sponsoring House Bill 699”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record