POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

New Jersey Bill A867 Establishes Stand Your Ground Self-Defense Law

Original title: Establishes "Stand Your Ground" self-defense law.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary CommitteeSponsors: Gerry Scharfenberger and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Assembly Bill 867 establishes a 'Stand Your Ground' self-defense law in New Jersey, removing the for individuals in lawful control of a dwelling or vehicle and authorizing the use of non-deadly or under specific circumstances. The measure creates a legal presumption of reasonable fear of death or serious harm when confronting forcible unlawful entry, repeals existing statute N.J.S.2C:3-6 regarding the defense of premises, and takes effect on the 90th day following enactment.

Why it matters

Modifies legal standards governing criminal and civil liability for individuals who use defensive force inside a dwelling or occupied vehicle by eliminating the traditional requirement to retreat before using force.

Background
  • New Jersey statutes historically required individuals to retreat from a threat if safely possible before resorting to deadly force outside of certain narrow home defense exceptions. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Residents and property occupants

Legal rights regarding the use of defensive force and the absence of a duty to retreat within dwellings and occupied vehicles are modified.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Officers acting in the performance of official duties are excluded from the legal presumption of forcible intruder threat under specified conditions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a resident have a duty to retreat under this bill?
No. A person who is in possession or control of a dwelling or is licensed or privileged to be there has no and has the right to stand their ground.
When does the legal presumption of fear NOT apply?
The presumption does not apply if the person against whom force is used is legally permitted to be in the dwelling or vehicle without a restraining order, is a child or grandchild in lawful custody, if the person using force is engaged in criminal activity, or if the person entering is a law enforcement officer performing official duties.
What prior law does this bill repeal?
The bill repeals N.J.S.2C:3-6, which is the current law concerning the use of force in defense of premises.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Elimination of Duty to Retreat

The measure shifts state legal standards by removing the duty to retreat for individuals in lawful control of dwellings or occupied vehicles.

Connected Entities

Auth, Erik Peterson, Gerry Scharfenberger
PersonAuth“Assemblyman co-sponsoring A867”Map →
PersonErik Peterson“Assemblyman sponsoring A867 representing District 23”Map →
PersonGerry Scharfenberger“Assemblyman sponsoring A867 representing District 13”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record