POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 1897 removes regulatory caps on marijuana facility licenses and mandates issuance for qualifying applicants

Original title: MARIJUANA FACILITIES

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsors: Adrian Plank and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services is required to issue marijuana cultivation, dispensary, and manufacturing facility licenses to any applicant meeting minimum standards, while removing all regulatory caps on the total number of licenses. The legislation preserves the state's ten percent ownership cap for license holders and any existing regulatory limits on license quantities.

Why it matters

Marijuana business applicants gain the right to receive operational licenses without state-imposed numerical caps, provided they meet constitutional standards and ownership limits.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Marijuana facility license applicants

Applicants are guaranteed to receive a license from the department provided they meet minimum standards.

Directly affected

Department of Health and Senior Services

The department is mandated to issue licenses to all qualifying applicants and must manage applications without regulatory numerical caps.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to receive a marijuana facility license under this bill?
Any applicant who meets the minimum standards for the respective license, unless denied to comply with the ten percent ownership cap.
Does the bill completely remove all restrictions on marijuana licenses?
It removes regulatory limits on the number of licenses, but applicants must still meet constitutional minimum standards and the department may enforce a ten percent ownership cap.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift from Capped to Demand-Driven Licensing

The bill moves state policy from fixed regulatory caps on marijuana facilities toward an open licensing framework based on meeting demand and minimum standards.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Department of Health and Senior Services
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Health and Senior Services“Responsible for issuing licenses and managing facility limits”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record