The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Iowa bans discriminatory school mascots referencing disabilities and establishes compliance grants
Last action · February 24, 2025: Subcommittee: Rozenboom, Donahue, and Kraayenbrink. S.J. 342 .Sponsor: Molly Donahue
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Iowa public educational institutions and participating private colleges are prohibited from adopting or using mascots, team names, or symbols that reference disabilities, and must complete a compliance review within one year. The bill establishes state-funded grant programs through the Department of Education and Board of Regents to help schools offset the costs of transitioning to new mascots.
Schools and public colleges statewide must audit their imagery, abandon prohibited symbols, and replace signage, uniforms, and educational materials by September 1, 2027, with state appropriations covering approved transition costs.
- Senate File 382 was introduced in the Iowa Senate during the 91st General Assembly by Senator Donahue. context
- The bill addresses the use of imagery associated with disabilities by educational institutions, tying compliance to eligibility for state tuition grants and establishing grant programs to defray transition costs. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Public educational institutions
School districts, accredited nonpublic schools, charter schools, innovation zone schools, regents institutions, and community colleges must audit their branding, eliminate discriminatory mascots, and transition to compliant names, symbols, and materials.
Accredited private and eligible institutions
Private higher education institutions participating in the Iowa tuition grants program must comply with mascot restrictions to remain eligible for program participation and may apply for transition grants.
Department of Education
The department must develop and administer a mascot grant program, adopt administrative rules, manage the grant fund, and establish transition requirements.
State Board of Regents
The board must develop and administer a separate mascot grant program for institutions under its control, adopt rules, and manage its respective grant fund.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is classified as a discriminatory mascot under this bill?
When do schools have to stop using existing uniforms and materials with these mascots?
Are private colleges affected by this legislation?
How will schools pay for the costs of changing their signs and uniforms?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 24, 2025SenateSubcommittee: Rozenboom, Donahue, and Kraayenbrink. S.J. 342 .
- Feb 19, 2025SenateIntroducedIntroduced, referred to Education. S.J. 312 .
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Statewide Mascot Regulation
Extends statutory mascot restrictions beyond cultural or ethnic references to specifically encompass symbols associated with disabilities.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.iowa.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz45Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
