POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota authorizes pharmacists to dispense ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine under provider protocols with liability protections

Original title: authorize the dispensing of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine under a written protocol developed by a health care provider, and to provide liability protection therefor.

Last action · February 5, 2026: Do Pass AmendedSponsors: Bobbi Andera and 21 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Pharmacists in South Dakota are newly authorized to dispense ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to adults aged 18 or older without a traditional patient-specific prescription, provided they follow a written protocol established by a licensed health care provider. The measure also grants civil and criminal immunity, as well as protection from professional licensing boards, to pharmacists and health care providers acting in good faith under these protocols, barring or willful misconduct.

Why it matters

Adult residents gain direct access to specific medications through participating pharmacies via standardized health protocols, while participating health care providers and pharmacists are shielded from legal and professional liability except in cases of or willful misconduct.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals 18 years or older

Adult residents gain the ability to obtain ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine directly from a pharmacist under a provider protocol.

Directly affected

Pharmacists

Pharmacists are authorized to dispense specific medications using non-patient-specific protocols and receive conditional liability protections.

Directly affected

Licensed health care providers

Providers are permitted to develop written protocols for dispensing these medications and receive conditional liability protections.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to receive ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine under these protocols?
Individuals who are eighteen years or older are eligible to receive the medications in accordance with a written provider protocol.
Are pharmacists protected from liability when dispensing these drugs under a protocol?
Yes, pharmacists acting in good faith are not criminally or civilly liable, nor are they subject to board disciplinary or adverse action, unless their actions constitute or willful misconduct.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Feb 5, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  2. Feb 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  3. Feb 3, 2026House
    Motion to amend
  4. Feb 3, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  5. Jan 15, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First read in House and referred to

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion failedHouse2/5/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Do Pass Amended

Total

70

Yes
28
No
40
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
2

How they voted (70)

46 more members
Nick FosnessParty not recordedno
Jessica BahmullerParty not recordedno
Terri JorgensonParty not recordedyes
Drew PetersonParty not recordedno
Scott MooreParty not recordedyes
Steve DuffyParty not recordedno
David KullParty not recordedno
John HughesParty not recordedno
Mike DerbyParty not recordedno
Kadyn WittmanParty not recordedno
Keri WeemsParty not recordedno
Tina MulallyParty not recordedyes
Eric EmeryParty not recordedno
Brian MulderParty not recordedno
Greg JamisonParty not recordedno
Amber ArlintParty not recordedexcused
Brandei SchaefbauerParty not recordedyes
Lana GreenfieldParty not recordedno
Tesa SchwansParty not recordedyes
Spencer GoschParty not recordedyes
Nicole Uhre-BalkParty not recordedno
Jack KolbeckParty not recordedno
Tim CzmowskiParty not recordedno
Mike StevensParty not recordedno
Liz MayParty not recordedno
Jim HalversonParty not recordedno
John SjaardaParty not recordedyes
Curt MassieParty not recordedno
Mellissa HeermannParty not recordedno
Jon HansenParty not recordedyes
Jeff BathkeParty not recordedexcused
Mary FitzgeraldParty not recordedno
Al NovstrupParty not recordedyes
Kent RoeParty not recordedno
Kaley NolzParty not recordedyes
John ShubeckParty not recordedno
Les HeinemannParty not recordedyes
Logan ManhartParty not recordedyes
Tony KayserParty not recordedyes
Chris KassinParty not recordedno
Julie AuchParty not recordedyes
Matt RobyParty not recordedno
Aaron AylwardParty not recordedyes
Bethany SoyeParty not recordedyes
Bobbi AnderaParty not recordedyes
Karla LemsParty not recordedyes
Show 1 earlier roll call

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Bobbi Andera, South Dakota Legislature
PersonBobbi Andera“Representative who introduced House Bill 1068”Map →
OrganizationSouth Dakota Legislature“Legislative body enacting the measure”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record