The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Delaware requires school board members to physically reside in their districts 75% of the year and allows residents to sue to remove them
Last action · June 30, 2025: Signed by GovernorSponsors: Madinah Wilson-Anton and 8 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This law requires school board candidates and members to both claim legal residence and physically reside in the district they represent. If a member is not physically present in the district for more than 75% of any yearlong period, they lose their qualification, and local residents can petition the Superior Court to declare a vacancy.
Enforces a physical presence standard for local educational decision-makers, giving everyday residents direct legal standing in court to challenge a member's residency status.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
School board members
Must maintain physical presence within their specific district for at least 75% of the year or risk losing their qualification to serve.
School district residents
Gain the legal standing to bring an action in Superior Court to declare a vacancy if a board member fails to meet residency rules.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a school board member is deployed for military service?
How can a resident enforce the residency requirement?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: Signed into law.
Procedural history
12 actions- Jun 30, 2025Office of the GovernorEnrolledSigned by Governor
- Jun 30, 2025HouseFloorPassed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 VACANT
- Jun 25, 2025SenateFloorPassed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 NO
- Jun 25, 2025SenateCommitteeAmendment SA 1 to HB 82 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
- Jun 25, 2025SenateLifted From Table in Senate
- Jun 24, 2025HouseCommitteeAmendment SA 1 to HB 82 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jun 24, 2025SenateLaid On Table in Senate
- May 21, 2025SenateCommitteeReported Out of Committee (Education) in Senate with 5 On Its Merits
- May 6, 2025SenateIntroducedAssigned to Education Committee in Senate
- May 6, 2025HouseFloorPassed By House. Votes: 33 YES 8 ABSENT
- Mar 26, 2025HouseCommitteeReported Out of Committee (Education) in House with 2 Favorable, 11 On Its Merits
- Mar 18, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced and Assigned to Education Committee in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
SM
Total
41
- Yes
- 40
- No
- 0
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 1
How they voted (40)
16 more members
Show 2 earlier roll calls
SM
Total
21
- Yes
- 20
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (21)
SM
Total
33
- Yes
- 33
- No
- 0
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (33)
9 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
legis.delaware.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
