POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Assembly Bill 1741 makes sexual battery committed inside an inhabited dwelling a felony or misdemeanor

Original title: Sexual battery.

Record date · September 8, 2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Assembly Bill 1741 allows to be punished as either a misdemeanor or a felony if the offense occurs inside an inhabited dwelling house, , or inhabited portion of another building entered without consent. The bill modifies existing law, which currently classifies sexual battery solely as a misdemeanor.

Why it matters

The legislation alters the potential criminal penalties for individuals convicted of committing within residential structures, shifting certain offenses from misdemeanors to wobblers punishable as felonies.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

local agencies and school districts

The bill imposes a state-mandated local program without requiring state reimbursement for certain costs.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does AB 1741 change the penalty for sexual battery?
It allows to be punished as a misdemeanor or a felony if the perpetrator entered an inhabited dwelling house, , or inhabited portion of another building without consent and committed the act inside.
What is the penalty for sexual battery under existing law?
Under existing law, a violation of is punishable solely as a misdemeanor.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

Coverage by outlet perspective1 article
Unrated 1
Blind spot - only covered by center outlets

Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history & redline

3 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 3 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing 02/05/26 - Introduced → 03/11/26 - Amended Assembly
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

pdf extract failed: Invalid PDF structure.

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

California Constitution
otherCalifornia Constitution“Governing document requiring state reimbursement for local mandates.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record