POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SB 1576FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026dead

Proposed Rules for Residential Utility Disconnections

Original title: Residential Utility Disconnections

March 13, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The bill would have established a minimum 60-day grace period for past-due accounts and created legal liability for utilities that disconnected service in violation of weather-based safety standards, potentially impacting utility operating costs and consumer service continuity.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Residential utility customers

Customers would have received protections against service disconnection during extreme weather and mandatory information regarding payment assistance.

Electric, public, and water utilities

Utilities would have been required to modify disconnection policies, waive specific fees, and assume legal liability for non-compliance.

What changed

Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill would have prohibited electric, public, and water utilities from disconnecting residential service during extreme heat, freezing temperatures, or declared states of emergency. It also mandated that utilities waive certain fees, provide clear disconnection policies, and offer payment assistance information to customers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Would this bill have stopped all utility disconnections?
No. It would have prohibited disconnections for nonpayment under specific weather conditions, on weekends/holidays, or before an account was 60 days past due. It explicitly allowed for emergency disconnections for health and safety purposes.
What happens if a utility violates these rules?
The utility would be liable to the customer for actual and consequential damages or $1,000, whichever is greater, plus court costs and attorney fees.

Why It Matters

The bill would have established a minimum 60-day grace period for past-due accounts and created legal liability for utilities that disconnected service in violation of weather-based safety standards, potentially impacting utility operating costs and consumer service continuity.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Weather-based utility regulation

The bill attempted to codify specific temperature and heat index thresholds as legal triggers for utility service protections.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record