POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Ohio restricts commercial use of automated license plate recognition data

Original title: Restrict commercial use of license plate recognition data

Last action · March 4, 2026: Referred to Public SafetySponsor: Kevin Miller

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 725 prohibits individuals and businesses from knowingly collecting, using, selling, transferring, or sharing data gathered from s for commercial purposes, carrying a first-degree misdemeanor penalty for violations.

Why it matters

Commercial entities and private operators face criminal misdemeanor charges for monetizing or sharing plate-reader data, while law enforcement, insurance providers, and public agencies retain specific exemptions to handle such information.

Background
  • Automated license plate recognition systems use high-speed cameras and computer algorithms to capture and log vehicle license plate numbers. context
  • The bill was introduced in the 136th General Assembly of Ohio during the 2025-2026 regular session. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Commercial entities

Commercial businesses face misdemeanor charges if they collect, use, sell, transfer, or share automated license plate recognition data outside of permitted exemptions.

Directly affected

Law enforcement agencies

Law enforcement agencies and peace officers are explicitly exempted to collect, use, or share automated license plate recognition data during their law enforcement activities.

Directly affected

Insurance providers

Insurance providers are permitted to continue collecting and using automated license plate recognition data in the course of normal business activities.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Bill 725 restrict?
It restricts individuals and businesses from knowingly collecting, using, selling, transferring, or sharing data obtained from s for commercial purposes.
Are insurance companies or private property managers still allowed to use plate reader data?
Yes. The bill explicitly exempts normal business activities such as insurance purposes or regulating access to private property from the commercial restriction.
What is the penalty for violating the commercial ban?
Anyone who violates the prohibition is guilty of a .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Safety
  2. Mar 3, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Introduction of Commercial Restrictions on Plate Reader Data

The measure establishes a statutory penalty framework under section 4549.07 to criminalize commercial monetization of automated license plate reader data while maintaining broad carve-outs for government and insurance operations.

Connected Entities

Kevin Miller, General Assembly of the State of Ohio, State Highway Patrol
PersonKevin Miller“Representative for District 69”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Ohio“Legislative body enacting the statute”Map →
OrganizationState Highway Patrol“Employing troopers included under peace officer definitions”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record