POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Pennsylvania House Bill 974 makes public records request identification mandatory and expands agency review factors

Original title: An Act amending the act of February 14, 2008 (P.L.6, No.3), known as the Right-to-Know Law, in procedure, further providing for written requests.

Last action · March 19, 2025: Referred to INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND OPERATIONS, March 19, 2025Sponsors: Tim Brennan and 15 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania House Bill 974 updates the state's Right-to-Know Law by changing a public records request recommendation into a mandatory requirement to identify or describe requested records with sufficient specificity. The measure also allows s to consider agency burden, third-party privacy, and legal penalties when evaluating request specificity.

Why it matters

People requesting public documents in Pennsylvania will face stricter specificity standards, while local and state agencies gain explicit legal factors to evaluate and potentially restrict broad or burdensome information requests.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Commonwealth, local, judicial, and legislative agencies

Agency open-records officers are explicitly authorized to factor agency workload, legal penalties, and third-party privacy into record request evaluations.

Directly affected

Public records requesters

Requesters must ensure their written inquiries meet a mandatory specificity standard rather than a discretionary recommendation.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a requester still need to explain why they want public records?
No, a written request still does not need to include any explanation of the requester's reason or intended use unless otherwise required by law.
What factors can an open-records officer evaluate when deciding if a request is specific enough?
An officer may consider the administrative burden on the agency, potential harm to third-party privacy or proprietary interests, and applicable state or federal disclosure laws and penalties.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Mar 19, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND OPERATIONS, March 19, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Right-to-Know Law
otherRight-to-Know Law“The underlying 2008 act governing public access to information in Pennsylvania”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record