POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah Bill HB 92 Allocates Presidential Electoral Votes by Congressional District

Original title: Presidential Electors Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Andrew Stoddard

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill alters Utah's electoral vote allocation by awarding one electoral vote to the presidential and vice-presidential candidates who win the highest vote count in each individual Congressional district, while awarding the remaining two electoral votes to the statewide winners. It also standardizes candidate filing deadlines for vice presidential candidates, requires notification to the lieutenant governor for vacancies, and sets the filing fee for presidential and vice-presidential candidates at $500.

Why it matters

Changes how Utah's al votes are distributed among candidates by splitting them across Congressional districts rather than awarding all of them on a strictly winner-take-all statewide basis, impacting presidential campaign strategies and the weight of regional voter outcomes.

Background
  • Utah traditionally allocates its presidential electoral votes on a winner-take-all basis statewide. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates

Candidates must navigate district-by-district electoral vote distribution, comply with a $500 filing fee, and meet standardized declaration and certification deadlines.

Directly affected

Registered Political Parties

Parties must choose and certify presidential electors for each Congressional district and statewide before established statutory deadlines.

Directly affected

Utah Voters

Voters in individual Congressional districts directly influence the allocation of specific electoral votes rather than contributing solely to a statewide winner-take-all total.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the filing fee for presidential and vice-presidential candidates?
An individual filing a for president or vice president of the United States must pay a filing fee of $500.
Do presidential electors get paid for their services?
No, s may not receive compensation for their services.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
  4. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
  5. Feb 6, 2026House
    House Comm - Held
  6. Feb 6, 2026House
    House Comm - Held
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Feb 2, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  2. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  3. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  4. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  5. Jan 13, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0092
  6. Jan 13, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0092
  7. Dec 29, 2025Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0092
  8. Dec 29, 2025Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0092
  9. Dec 29, 2025Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  10. Dec 29, 2025Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Transition to District-Level Electoral Vote Allocation

The legislation shifts the state's presidential voting structure by allocating electoral votes by Congressional district rather than purely statewide winner-take-all.

Connected Entities

Lieutenant Governor, State Board of Canvassers, Andrew Stoddard
OrganizationLieutenant Governor“Receives candidate filings, certifications, and vacancy notifications”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Canvassers“Convenes to compute and determine election votes”Map →
PersonAndrew Stoddard“Chief Sponsor of HB 92”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record