The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Arizona Legislature recognizes Judea and Samaria and rejects the term West Bank in official state documents
Last action · April 21, 2026: Transmit to Secretary of StateSponsors: David Livingston and 45 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
The Arizona Legislature formally recognizes the historical, biblical, and legal legitimacy of the regions known as Judea and Samaria while rejecting the term "West Bank" as a political construct. Under this , all official state communications and documents are directed to use the terms "Judea" and "Samaria."
Changes how state government entities refer to specific geographic territories in official communications by replacing a widely used geopolitical term with historical and biblical names.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Arizona state agencies
Must use the terms "Judea" and "Samaria" in all official state communications and documents.
Key Facts
- The Arizona Legislature formally recognizes the historical, biblical, and legal legitimacy of Judea and Samaria.
- The resolution formally rejects the term "West Bank" as a modern political construct.
- All official state communications, documents, and references regarding the regions are directed to use the terms "Judea" and "Samaria."
- The text cites the San Remo Resolution of 1920 and the Mandate for Palestine as legal foundations for the Jewish national home.
Show all 5 facts
- The resolution asserts that control of the region is essential for Israel's military defense and strategic interests.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does HCR 2047 change regarding state documents?
Does this resolution carry the force of law?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
15 actions- Apr 21, 2026EnrolledTransmit to Secretary of State
- Apr 20, 2026HouseTransmit to House
- Apr 20, 2026SenateFloorPASSED
- Apr 20, 2026SenateDP
- Mar 23, 2026SenatePFC
- Mar 16, 2026SenateCommitteeDP
Show 9 earlier actions
- Mar 9, 2026SenateFloorSenate Second Reading
- Mar 5, 2026SenateIntroducedSenate First Reading
- Feb 23, 2026SenateTransmit to Senate
- Feb 23, 2026HouseFloorPASSED
- Feb 17, 2026HouseDP
- Feb 9, 2026HouseC&P
- Feb 4, 2026HouseCommitteeDP
- Feb 2, 2026HouseFloorHouse Second Reading
- Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroducedHouse First Reading
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Passed
Total
30
- Yes
- 17
- No
- 12
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (24)
Show 1 earlier roll call
Passed
Total
60
- Yes
- 32
- No
- 25
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 3
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (53)
29 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 41 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
apps.azleg.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance35How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
