POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALcongressional record

Proposed Amendment to Keep Certain Public Airports Open

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6200

June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This amendment would restrict the ability of local authorities or private owners to close or repurpose public airports that were originally acquired through the , requiring a new act of Congress for any such change.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Public airport operators

Operators of airports originally conveyed under the 1944 Act would be restricted from closing or repurposing their facilities without Congressional approval.

Federal Aviation Administration

The agency is mandated to ensure compliance with the new operational requirements for these airports.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 24, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Senator Sheehy has proposed an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill that would prevent the closure or conversion of certain public airports originally transferred from the federal government. If passed, these airports would be classified as s and could only be closed or repurposed with specific authorization from Congress.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which airports would be affected by this amendment?
The amendment applies to any real property or interest in property (such as a ) that was conveyed by the United States for use as an airport under the or its successor statutes, provided the airport is still in use as a public airport.
Can a local government still decide to close one of these airports?
No, under this amendment, such an airport could not be closed, disposed of, or converted to non-airport use without specific authorization from the U.S. Congress.

Why It Matters

This amendment would restrict the ability of local authorities or private owners to close or repurpose public airports that were originally acquired through the , requiring a new act of Congress for any such change.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federalization of Local Assets

The amendment attempts to override existing local agreements and settlements by reclassifying local public infrastructure as federal 'defense assets'.

Connected Entities

personMr. SheehyUnited States Senator who submitted the amendment.Map →
organizationDepartment of TransportationThe Secretary of Transportation is tasked with ensuring compliance.Map →
otherSurplus Property Act of 1944The historical legislation governing the original conveyance of the airport propMap →
organizationFederal Aviation AdministrationResponsible for ensuring compliance with the proposed section.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record