POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Expansion and Renaming of Salem Maritime National Historic Site

Original title: Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act

Record date · December 19, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill proposes renaming the Salem Maritime National Historic Site to the 'Salem Maritime National Historical Park' and mandates a federal study to determine if additional local sites should be added to the park's boundaries. The study would focus on areas related to maritime, coastal defense, and military history in and around Salem, Massachusetts.

Why it matters

The bill initiates a formal federal review process that could lead to the expansion of the National Park System in Salem, potentially changing land management and federal resource allocation for local historic sites.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

City of Salem residents

The study area for potential park expansion is defined as the city of Salem and its vicinity.

Directly affected

Secretary of the Interior

The Secretary is tasked with conducting the boundary study and submitting a report to Congress.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill immediately add new land to the park?
No. It only mandates a study to evaluate the of adding new sites.
What is the deadline for the study report?
The report must be submitted to Congress no later than 3 years after funds are made available for the study.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of Historical Scope

The bill explicitly expands the scope of the park's mission to include military and coastal defense history, not just maritime history.

Connected Entities

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, National Park System and 6 more
OrganizationCommittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate“Receives the study report”Map →
OrganizationSenate Energy and Natural Resources Committee“Bill referred to this committee”Map →
OrganizationNational Park System“Potential expansion target”Map →
PersonSecretary of the Interior“Responsible for conducting the boundary study”Map →
locationSalem, Massachusetts“Location of the National Historic Site”Map →
locationSalem Armory Visitor Center building“Included in the study area”Map →
locationSalem Armory Park“Included in the study area”Map →
OrganizationSenate“Introduced by Mr. Markey”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record