POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho House Bill 836 establishes the Idaho Personnel Reduction Act to eliminate long-vacant state positions and mandate detailed travel expense reporting

Original title: STATE BUDGET – Adds to existing law to establish the Idaho Personnel Reduction Act and to provide for the reporting of state employee travel expenses.

Last action · March 25, 2026: Take bill off General Orders; referred to Appropriations

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Idaho state departments must identify and eliminate full-time equivalent positions that have been vacant for more than 180 calendar days, while also reporting comprehensive state employee travel expenses in their annual budget submissions.

Why it matters

Changes how state agencies budget for personnel and travel, redirecting a portion of eliminated executive branch position funds to legislative district support personnel starting in 2026 and 2027.

Background
  • The Idaho Legislature operates under regular sessions, where bills relating to the state budget and statutory additions are considered. context
  • Section 67-3502 of the Idaho Code governs agency budget requests submitted to the state. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Idaho state departments and agencies

Must identify and eliminate long-vacant positions, adjust annual budget submissions, and report detailed employee travel expenses.

Directly affected

Legislative branch

Receives annual transfers of one-third of eliminated executive branch positions and fringe benefits for district support personnel and administrative staff in 2026 and 2027.

Directly affected

State employees

Subject to mandatory detailed reporting of their travel expenses and potential elimination of vacant positions within their departments.

Key Facts

  • Establishes the Idaho Personnel Reduction Act to eliminate long-vacant state positions.
  • Requires every state department to identify vacant appropriated full-time equivalent positions (FTP) vacant for more than 180 calendar days as of the end of the previous fiscal year.
  • Mandates that identified vacant FTPs be eliminated along with their associated salaries and fringe benefits in annual budget submissions, starting on or before July 1, 2026, and annually by September 1 thereafter.
  • Allows departments to request retention of vacant positions vacant for less than one year, provided they are fully funded from existing funds.
Show all 8 facts
  • Ninety-five percent of moneys transferred to the legislative account shall be allocated for district support personnel for individual legislators and associated administrative staff.
  • Requires departments to detail individual vacant FTPs, length of vacancy, job descriptions, funding availability, and reasons for vacancies in their annual budget submissions.
  • Requires detailed reporting of all state employee travel expenses from the preceding fiscal year in annual budget submissions, including airfare, lodging, food, and third-party payments.
  • Declares an emergency, putting the act in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to state positions that have been vacant for a long time?
Positions vacant for more than 180 calendar days must be eliminated, and the budgeted amount for their salaries and must be reduced in the department's annual budget submission.
Can a department keep a recently vacant position?
Yes, if the position has been vacant for less than one year, a department may request to retain it, provided they fully fund it from existing funds and fill it as soon as practicable.
What travel expense details must state departments report?
Departments must detail total travel expenses, travel occurrences and purposes, destinations, expenses like airfare, mileage, car rental, lodging, food, and conference fees, dates of travel, and portions paid by entities other than the state.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 25, 2026Committee
    Take bill off General Orders; referred to Appropriations
  2. Mar 13, 2026
    Reported out of Committee, Recommend place on General Orders
  3. Mar 6, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Appropriations
  4. Mar 5, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Inter-branch Resource Transfer

The legislation creates a direct mechanism in 2026 and 2027 to shift resources and personnel funding from executive branch agencies to legislative district support staff.

Connected Entities

Appropriations Committee, House of Representatives
OrganizationAppropriations Committee“Committee that introduced House Bill No. 836.”Map →
OrganizationHouse of Representatives“Chamber of the Idaho Legislature where House Bill No. 836 was introduced.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record