The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.New York law permits part-time officer Daniel Montalto to take civil service exam for full-time police role in Shawangunk
Last action · September 25, 2026: SIGNED CHAP.297Sponsor: Brian Maher
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
New York enacted a special law allowing part-time police officer Daniel Montalto to bypass standard civil service age and eligibility rules to take the competitive exam and seek full-time employment in the town of Shawangunk.
Waives specific state civil service restrictions solely for one named municipal employee, creating a direct pathway to a full-time police appointment that would otherwise be legally barred.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Daniel Montalto
Gains legal eligibility to take the competitive civil service exam and be placed on the hiring list for a full-time police officer position.
Town of Shawangunk
Gains the statutory authorization to consider a specific part-time employee for full-time police appointment despite existing state restrictions.
Key Facts
- Daniel Montalto is authorized to take the competitive civil service examination for the position of police officer despite standard restrictions.
- The measure exempts Montalto from age requirements under paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of section 58 of the civil service law.
- Eligibility is contingent upon Montalto's score on the competitive examination for placement on the eligible list.
- The appointment applies specifically to full-time employment with the town of Shawangunk police department.
Show all 6 facts
- Montalto remains subject to all other merit and fitness provisions of the civil service law applicable to full-time police officers.
- The act takes effect immediately.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this law apply to anyone other than Daniel Montalto?
Does this guarantee Daniel Montalto a full-time police job?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: Signed into law.
Procedural history
18 actions- Sep 25, 2026HouseEnrolledSIGNED CHAP.297
- Sep 22, 2026HouseEnrolledDELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
- Jun 1, 2026SenateRETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 1, 2026SenateFloorPASSED SENATE
- Jun 1, 2026Senate3RD READING CAL.1477
- Jun 1, 2026SenateSUBSTITUTED FOR S8398
Show 12 earlier actions
- May 29, 2026SenateCommitteeREFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS
- May 29, 2026HouseDELIVERED TO SENATE
- May 29, 2026HouseFloorPASSED ASSEMBLY
- May 29, 2026HouseHOME RULE REQUEST
- May 29, 2026HouseORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.258
- May 29, 2026HouseRULES REPORT CAL.258
- May 29, 2026HouseREPORTED
- May 28, 2026HouseCommitteeREPORTED REFERRED TO RULES
- Jan 7, 2026HouseCommitteeREFERRED TO GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES
- Jun 2, 2025HousePRINT NUMBER 2733A
- Jun 2, 2025HouseCommitteeAMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES
- Jan 22, 2025HouseCommitteeREFERRED TO GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Senate floor vote
Total
63
- Yes
- 59
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 2
How they voted (63)
39 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.nysenate.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance15How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
