POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia allows commercial property insurance policies to be underwritten for any mutually agreed-upon amount

Original title: Clarifying commercial real property insurance policies

Last action · January 29, 2026: To Banking and InsuranceSponsors: Mike Oliverio and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

West Virginia allows insurers and property owners to set commercial and industrial real property insurance policies at any agreed-upon amount, including values lower than the replacement cost. The change applies to commercial fire and marine insurance policies in the state.

Why it matters

Property owners and insurers gain the explicit legal flexibility to contract for commercial insurance coverage based on market value, depreciated cost, or other agreed-upon sums rather than strict .

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Commercial real property owners

Property owners are permitted to negotiate and underwrite commercial property insurance policies for alternative agreed-upon valuation amounts.

Directly affected

Insurers providing fire insurance

Insurers are authorized to underwrite commercial real property policies for any mutually agreed-upon total amount.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can commercial property insurance policies in West Virginia be set below replacement cost value under this bill?
Yes. The bill clarifies that commercial real property policies can be underwritten for any agreed-upon amount, including sums less than the .
Does this change apply to policies covered by multiple insurers?
No. The statute specifies that the provision allowing agreed-upon underwriting amounts does not apply where insurance has been procured from two or more insurers covering the same interest.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Banking and Insurance
  2. Jan 29, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate
  3. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Banking and Insurance
  4. Jan 29, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Mike Oliverio, Charles Clements, Tom Takubo
PersonMike Oliverio“Senator introducing Senate Bill 661”Map →
PersonCharles Clements“Senator co-sponsoring Senate Bill 661”Map →
PersonTom Takubo“Senator co-sponsoring Senate Bill 661”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record