POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Protecting Americans from Government Spying Act (Senate Amendment 6160)

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6160

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This amendment proposes new restrictions on how federal agencies access the private communications of U.S. persons collected under of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. It generally requires a warrant for accessing such information, with specific exceptions for emergencies, consent, and cybersecurity threats.

Why it matters

This amendment would change the legal requirements for federal agencies to access the private communications of U.S. citizens and residents, potentially requiring a warrant for searches that currently do not require one.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. persons

Their communications content and information are subject to new warrant requirements and query restrictions.

Directly affected

Federal agencies with access to Section 702 data

They must implement new query procedures, maintain electronic records of access, and report compliance to Congress.

Directly affected

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

The court is tasked with reviewing emergency access justifications and compliance.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this amendment stop the government from collecting data under Section 702?
No, it does not stop the collection of data. It restricts how federal agencies can search and access the communications of U.S. persons within that collected data.
Are there any exceptions to the warrant requirement?
Yes, exceptions include cases involving imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm, emergency authorizations, individual consent, and specific cybersecurity activities.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift toward warrant-based access

The amendment represents a significant policy shift by explicitly requiring a warrant for accessing U.S. person information within Section 702 data, moving away from current administrative query standards.

Connected Entities

Mr. Durbin, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, Mr. Lee and 1 more
PersonMr. Durbin“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
otherForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978“The primary law being amended.”Map →
PersonMr. Lee“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationForeign Intelligence Surveillance Court“The court responsible for overseeing surveillance warrants and compliance.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance90
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record