POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Arizona Legislature urges U.S. Congress to divest the federal government from the San Carlos Irrigation Project electric system

Original title: San Carlos irrigation project; divestiture

Last action · June 10, 2026: Transmit to Secretary of StateSponsor: T.J. Shope

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

The Arizona Legislature officially urges the United States Congress to enact legislation divesting the federal government and the Bureau of Indian Affairs from the San Carlos Irrigation Project electric system and to provide funding for system improvements.

Why it matters

The measure petitions federal lawmakers to alter how a regional electric utility is governed and funded, potentially shifting operational control to local nonprofit utilities and tribes to address ongoing rate instability and service outages.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

San Carlos irrigation project customers

Customers experience rate instability, service cutoffs, and power outages due to system challenges and federal regulations.

Directly affected

San Carlos irrigation project employees

Employees rely on the system for stable employment, which discussions aim to support.

Directly affected

San Carlos Apache Tribe

The tribe has engaged in discussions to service the SCIP electric system within its community boundaries.

Directly affected

Gila River Indian Community

The community has engaged in discussions to service the SCIP electric system within its community boundaries.

Key Facts

  • The San Carlos irrigation project electric system is operated by the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs.
  • Drought conditions have reduced hydropower generation, forcing the system to purchase power on the open market.
  • Federal procedures and regulations require purchases to be made on a cash basis from short-term contracts and the day ahead market, causing rate instability.
  • Rate increases of up to 40% were recently implemented to raise funds for capital improvements, leading to service cutoffs for customers unable to pay.
Show all 9 facts
  • Federal regulations limit the ability to invest in system improvements using funds outside federal appropriations or by issuing bonds.
  • System degradation has caused repeated and extended power outages across tribal and nontribal lands during summer and winter seasons.
  • Neighboring nonprofit public power utilities, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and the Gila River Indian Community, have engaged in discussions to service the entire SCIP electric system.
  • The Arizona Legislature prays that Congress provides funding for a necessary system study and infrastructure improvements.
  • Copies of the Memorial are to be transmitted to the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and each Member of Congress from Arizona.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does SCM 1007 ask the federal government to do?
It asks the United States Congress to pass legislation divesting the federal government and the Bureau of Indian Affairs of the San Carlos irrigation project electric system and to provide funding for system improvements and a study.
Why has the San Carlos irrigation project experienced rate increases and power outages?
Extended drought has reduced hydropower generation, and federal regulations restrict long-term contracts and bond issuance, leading to short-term market purchases, rate instability, and infrastructure degradation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Jun 10, 2026Enrolled
    Transmit to Secretary of State
  2. Jun 9, 2026Senate
    Transmit to Senate
  3. Jun 9, 2026HouseFloor
    PASSED
  4. Apr 8, 2026House
    DP
  5. Mar 23, 2026House
    C&P
  6. Mar 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    DP
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026HouseFloor
    House Second Reading
  2. Mar 5, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House First Reading
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    Transmit to House
  4. Mar 3, 2026SenateFloor
    PASSED
  5. Feb 23, 2026Senate
    PFC
  6. Feb 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    DP
  7. Feb 9, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Second Reading
  8. Feb 5, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse6/9/2026Arizona LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Passed

Total

60

Yes
54
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
6
Abstain
0

How they voted (48)

24 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

T.J. Shope, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, President of the United States Senate and 3 more
PersonT.J. Shope“Senator who introduced SCM 1007”Map →
PersonSpeaker of the United States House of Representatives“Recipient of the transmitted Memorial”Map →
PersonPresident of the United States Senate“Recipient of the transmitted Memorial”Map →
OrganizationBureau of Indian Affairs“Federal agency operating the San Carlos irrigation project electric system”Map →
OrganizationSan Carlos Apache Tribe“Nonprofit public power utility engaged in discussions to service the SCIP electr”Map →
OrganizationGila River Indian Community“Nonprofit public power utility engaged in discussions to service the SCIP electr”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record