The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas Prohibits Political Subdivisions From Using Public Funds for Lobbyists and Certain Associations
Last action · August 11, 2025: FiledSponsor: David Spiller
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas HB 296 prohibits local s from spending public funds to hire registered lobbyists or to pay dues to nonprofit associations that represent political subdivisions and employ registered lobbyists. The bill allows taxpayers to seek court injunctions and recover attorney fees if local governments violate these restrictions. The measure applies to expenditures made on or after the effective date.
Local governments and certain municipal or county associations face restrictions on how taxpayer money is spent on legislative advocacy, while local taxpayers gain the legal standing to sue to halt prohibited spending and recover court costs.
- House Bill 296 was introduced during the 89th legislative session (89S1) in Texas by Representative Spiller. context
- Chapter 556 of the Texas Government Code regulates political activities by public entities and employees. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Political subdivisions
Political subdivisions are prohibited from using public funds to hire registered lobbyists or pay dues to certain lobbying nonprofit associations.
Taxpayers and residents of political subdivisions
Taxpayers gain the legal right to seek injunctive relief against political subdivisions engaging in prohibited lobbying expenditures and to recover attorney's fees.
Nonprofit associations representing political subdivisions
Nonprofit associations that employ registered lobbyists may lose dues payments from political subdivisions unless they fall under specific exemptions.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can local government employees still testify before legislative committees?
What recourse do local taxpayers have if a political subdivision violates these rules?
Does this ban apply to associations representing law enforcement?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Aug 11, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Removal of Association Lobbying Restriction in Local Government Code
The bill amends Section 89.002 of the Local Government Code to remove the prior requirement that county associations avoid influencing legislation, shifting county lobbying constraints into the newly created Government Code Section 556.0056.
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools