
NewsWPLG Local 10November 1, 2026Miami-Dade County
Federal judge permanently dismisses Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal
Photo: WPLG Local 10
A federal judge threw out Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch with prejudice on Saturday, ruling that the president failed to prove the defendants acted with actual malice. The lawsuit stemmed from an investigative report detailing a sexually suggestive letter from a 2003 birthday album for Jeffrey Epstein that bore Trump’s name. The dismissal is permanent and prevents the lawsuit from being refiled.
Read the full story at WPLG Local 10Why It Matters
The permanent closure of the $10 billion legal action ends a major high-profile media lawsuit without financial recovery or a retraction, reinforcing the strict First Amendment legal standards required for public figures to win claims.
Key Facts
- U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles permanently dismissed Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Saturday.
- The lawsuit was dismissed 'with prejudice,' meaning it is a permanent dismissal and cannot be refiled.
- The judge ruled that Trump failed to prove the defendants made defamatory statements with 'actual malice' as required by law for public figures.
- The underlying lawsuit centered on a Wall Street Journal report about a 2003 birthday album compiled for Jeffrey Epstein containing a letter bearing Trump’s name.
- Trump denied writing the letter, calling the newspaper story false, malicious, and defamatory.
- Judge Gayles had previously dismissed the initial complaint in April without prejudice, giving Trump an opportunity to file an amended complaint in May.
- The ruling cited the 1964 Supreme Court precedent New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which sets a high legal bar for public figures in libel cases.
- The judge noted that the Journal's reporting explicitly included Trump's denial and did not ignore or minimize it.
- The dismissal occurs amid a broader context of adversarial relations and separate lawsuits between the administration and various media organizations.
Who's Mentioned
otherNew York Times Co. v. Sullivan“Supreme Court ruling establishing the actual malice standard”OrganizationCNN“News organization suing Trump over White House access”OrganizationMS NOW“News organization suing Trump over White House access”PersonRupert Murdoch“Media mogul and defendant in the lawsuit”locationNew York“Location of the jail where Epstein died”locationBritish“Nationality descriptor for Ghislaine Maxwell”locationMiami“Location of the federal court where the suit was heard”OrganizationThe Wall Street Journal“Defendant news organization targeted by the lawsuit”PersonJeffrey Epstein“Late sex offender whose 2003 birthday album featured the disputed letter”OrganizationBBC“News organization involved in separate lawsuits with Trump”PersonDarrin Gayles“U.S. District Judge presiding over the case in Miami”PersonDonald Trump“Plaintiff who filed the $10 billion lawsuit”OrganizationThe Associated Press“News organization involved in separate lawsuits and requested comment”PersonGhislaine Maxwell“British socialite who reportedly collected the birthday album”OrganizationPolitico“News organization suing Trump over White House access”
