POLISCOPE
Back to feed
NewsWPLG Local 10November 1, 2026Miami-Dade County

Federal judge permanently dismisses Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal

Photo: WPLG Local 10

A federal judge threw out Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch with prejudice on Saturday, ruling that the president failed to prove the defendants acted with actual malice. The lawsuit stemmed from an investigative report detailing a sexually suggestive letter from a 2003 birthday album for Jeffrey Epstein that bore Trump’s name. The dismissal is permanent and prevents the lawsuit from being refiled.

Read the full story at WPLG Local 10

Why It Matters

The permanent closure of the $10 billion legal action ends a major high-profile media lawsuit without financial recovery or a retraction, reinforcing the strict First Amendment legal standards required for public figures to win claims.

Key Facts

  • U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles permanently dismissed Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Saturday.
  • The lawsuit was dismissed 'with prejudice,' meaning it is a permanent dismissal and cannot be refiled.
  • The judge ruled that Trump failed to prove the defendants made defamatory statements with 'actual malice' as required by law for public figures.
  • The underlying lawsuit centered on a Wall Street Journal report about a 2003 birthday album compiled for Jeffrey Epstein containing a letter bearing Trump’s name.
  • Trump denied writing the letter, calling the newspaper story false, malicious, and defamatory.
  • Judge Gayles had previously dismissed the initial complaint in April without prejudice, giving Trump an opportunity to file an amended complaint in May.
  • The ruling cited the 1964 Supreme Court precedent New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which sets a high legal bar for public figures in libel cases.
  • The judge noted that the Journal's reporting explicitly included Trump's denial and did not ignore or minimize it.
  • The dismissal occurs amid a broader context of adversarial relations and separate lawsuits between the administration and various media organizations.

Who's Mentioned