POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Ohio Bill Requires Employers to Use E-Verify and Establishes Fines for Noncompliance

Original title: Require additional Ohio employers to use E-verify

Last action · May 20, 2026: Referred to Commerce and LaborSponsors: Josh Williams and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 921 requires covered employers to verify employee work eligibility through the program and prohibits continuing employment after receiving a . The legislation establishes civil fines ranging from $250 to $25,000 for violations, permits the attorney general to investigate complaints, and mandates permanent license revocation for businesses that knowingly employ unauthorized aliens.

Why it matters

Covered Ohio employers face mandatory verification duties, potential fines up to $25,000 for specific violations, state contract disqualifications for up to two years, and the risk of permanent business license revocation for employing unauthorized workers.

Background
  • E-Verify is an internet-based system operated by the federal government that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. context
  • House Bill 921 was introduced in the 136th General Assembly of Ohio and referred to the House Commerce and Labor committee. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Covered Employers

Covered employers must use the E-Verify program for hiring, maintain records, face tiered civil fines for noncompliance, and risk state contract bans or license revocation.

Directly affected

Covered Employees

Covered employees are subject to identity and legal working status confirmation checks through E-Verify.

Directly affected

State Agencies

State agencies must include E-Verify compliance provisions in nonresidential construction contracts and undergo periodic review by the attorney general.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who qualifies as a covered employer under House Bill 921?
A covered employer is any person who has one or more covered employees, including agents of a covered employer.
What happens if an employer receives a final nonconfirmation from E-Verify?
The employer is prohibited from continuing to employ the individual after receiving a notice of .
How long must employers keep E-Verify confirmation records?
Employers must keep records for three years after the date of hire or one year after the date the employee's employment is terminated, whichever is later.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. May 20, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to Commerce and Labor
  2. May 19, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Mandatory E-Verify

The bill broadens verification requirements beyond construction to encompass various additional employment categories and state contractors.

Connected Entities

D.J. Swearingen, Josh Williams, Director of Administrative Services and 5 more
PersonD.J. Swearingen“Representative, District 89”Map →
PersonJosh Williams“Representative, District 44”Map →
PersonDirector of Administrative Services“Official who maintains lists of ineligible contractors”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Homeland Security“Jointly administers E-Verify”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“State official tasked with investigating complaints and issuing notices of viola”Map →
locationOhio“State legislature enacting the bill”Map →
OrganizationSocial Security Administration“Jointly administers E-Verify”Map →
PersonDirector of Commerce“Official who conducts adjudicatory hearings”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record