POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SB 766FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026dead

Proposed State Control Over Local Bag and Container Bans

Original title: Waste Management

March 13, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would have invalidated existing local ordinances that restrict single-use plastics or other s, shifting authority over these consumer items from city and county governments to the state of Florida.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Local governments

Local governments would have lost the authority to regulate or tax auxiliary containers within their jurisdictions.

Retailers

Retailers would have been subject to uniform state-level regulations regarding packaging rather than varying local ordinances.

Division of Recreation and Parks

The division would have gained specific authority to regulate auxiliary containers within state parks.

What changed

Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Background

  • The bill was introduced during the 2026 legislative session and died in the Environment and Natural Resources committee. context

Summary

This bill would have prohibited local governments from enacting their own bans or taxes on bags, cups, and other food packaging, moving that regulatory power to the state level. It also sought to remove outdated reporting requirements for the Department of Environmental Protection and clarified rules for glass containers on public beaches.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would have invalidated existing local ordinances that restrict single-use plastics or other s, shifting authority over these consumer items from city and county governments to the state of Florida.

Frequently Asked Questions

Would this bill have banned plastic bags?
No. The bill would have prevented local governments from banning or taxing them, effectively keeping the decision-making power at the state level.
Could my city still ban glass bottles on the beach?
Yes. The bill explicitly permitted local governments to continue restricting glass s on public beaches.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

AARP

$4,110,000

2026

HEALTH ISSUESMEDICARE/MEDICAIDLAW ENFORCEMENT/CRIME/CRIMINAL JUSTICEPHARMACY

P.L. 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act H.R. 8867, Planning for Long-term Aging Needs (PLAN) Act H.R. 5861, Legacy Act of 2025 H.R. 9393, the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act. H.R. 9396, the Prior Authorization Accountability Act. S. 4916, the Aging with Artificial Intelligence Act. H.R. 8100, Safe Staffing Saves Lives Act. S. 3886, Nurses Belong in Nursing Homes Act. H.R. 6766/S. 3492, the Essential Caregivers Act of 2025. H.R. 7966/S. 4118, Hospice Care Accountability, Reform, and Enforcement (Hospice CARE) Act. S. 2120, the Older Americans Act Reauthorization Act of 2025 H.R. 5575, the Firefighters Assisting Seniors to Emergency Response (FASTER) Act of 2025. H.R. 3954/S. 4641, Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act. H.R.5554/S.2831, Stand Strong for Medicare Act. S. 3439/H.R. 6735, Connecting Caregivers to Medicare Act and efforts related to the bill S. 1227/H.R. 2491, Alleviating Barriers for Caregivers Act S. 668/H.R. 3183, Supporting Access to Falls Education and Prevention and Strengthening Training Efforts and Promoting Safety Initiatives (SAFE STEPS) for Veterans Act of 2025 CMS-1851-P, Hospice Proposed rule. CMS-1843-P, Skilled Nursing Facility Proposed rule. CMS-1844-P, Home Health Proposed rule. No bill number. Health care transparency. No bill number. Discussed use of artificial intelligence and health data technology. No bill number. Discussed health-related policies and activities around the fall respiratory virus season. No bill number. Discussed health insurance affordability proposals. No bill number. Discussed Nursing Home staffing standards, safety, and quality. No bill number. Discussed Nursing home transparency and ownership requirements. No bill number. Discussed home health, hospice, and long-term care. No bill number. Discussed falls prevention. No bill number. Discussed social isolation. No bill number. Discussed HUD Assisted Living Requirements No bill number. Discussed family caregiving. No bill number. Discussed AARP paper on Medicare Caregiver Training Services. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid community engagement interim final rule, including the family caregiver exemption. No bill number. Discussed the paid direct care workforce in long-term care. No bill number. Discussed the unaffordability of long-term care. No bill number. Discussed Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program and Medicaid HCBS spousal impoverishment protections. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid fraud and family caregivers, Medicaid self-direction programs. No bill number. Discussed sandwich generation family caregiver hearing and submitted a statement for the record discussing family caregivers and sandwich generation caregivers, programs that support them, AARP caregiving resources, and federal policies to support sandwich generation caregivers and caregivers more broadly. No bill number. Discussed long-term care. No bill number. CMS-2453-NC; Medicaid Program; 2028 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Quality Measure Set Submitted comments No bill number. Discussed expanding access to home care. No bill number. Discussed the increasing cost of home care No bill number. Discussed HSA use for telehealth chronic care management services/subscriptions. No bill number. Discussed artificial intelligence and technology

on behalf of Waste Management, Inc. of Florida

2026

Senate LDAView filing →

on behalf of Waste Management, Inc. of Florida

2026

Senate LDAView filing →

CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES INC.

on behalf of MULTISTATE ASSOCIATES INC. ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

GEORGE R. STEFFES INC.

on behalf of 3M

Senate LDAView filing →

CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES INC.

on behalf of MULTISTATE ASSOCIATES INC. ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

STEFFES INC. GEORGE R.

on behalf of 3M

Senate LDAView filing →

NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR LLP

on behalf of WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. & AFFILIATED ENTITIES

Senate LDAView filing →

TIDES GROUP, LLC

on behalf of CRYSTAL CLEAN, INC.

CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC.

on behalf of HANGAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

State Preemption of Local Packaging Rules

The bill represents a clear attempt to centralize environmental regulation of consumer packaging at the state level, overriding local municipal ordinances.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record