Proposed Florida Strategic Cryptocurrency Reserve Fund
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill would have authorized the state to use taxpayer-funded appropriations to purchase and hold volatile digital assets, creating a new state-level financial exposure to cryptocurrency markets.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
State Board of Administration
The board would have been responsible for the administration, management, and reporting requirements of the new reserve fund.
Florida residents
Residents' tax dollars could have been appropriated to purchase and manage cryptocurrency assets held by the state.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Why It Matters
The bill would have authorized the state to use taxpayer-funded appropriations to purchase and hold volatile digital assets, creating a new state-level financial exposure to cryptocurrency markets.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of the proposed reserve?
Who would have managed the cryptocurrency?
Could the state have lost money?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Commerce Committee)
Total
26
Yes
22
No
2
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (26)
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · absent
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · no
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · no
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Peggy Gossett-Seidman
Republican · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Tyler Sirois
Republican · yes
Wyman Duggan
Republican · yes
David Borrero
Republican · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · absent
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
+ 2 more
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Insurance & Banking Subcommittee)
Total
18
Yes
18
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (18)
Lisa Dunkley
Democratic · yes
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Berny Jacques
Republican · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Danny Alvarez
Republican · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Monique Miller
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Yvonne Hinson
Democratic · yes
Karen Gonzalez Pittman
Republican · yes
Jennifer Kincart Jonsson
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · yes
Adam Anderson
Republican · yes
Hillary Cassel
Republican · yes
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
State-Level Digital Asset Adoption
The bill represents a formal attempt to integrate decentralized digital assets into state-level sovereign wealth management.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools