POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Michigan requires state police and attorney general to provide annual school safety training materials

Original title: Education: safety; certain school safety and security training; require the department of state police and the office of school safety within the department of state police to provide to certain school personnel.

Last action · May 20, 2025: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONSponsors: Joseph Pavlov and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The bill would require the Department of State Police, the Office of School Safety, the Department of Education, and the Department of Attorney General to develop and provide annual school safety training materials and best practices for school resource officers, crisis response teams, school personnel, and security staff. The office would make these materials publicly available on its website, while nonpublic schools could elect to exempt themselves from the requirements. The measure would not take effect unless House Bill No. 4222 and House Bill No. 4223 of the 103rd Legislature are enacted into law.

Why it matters

School districts, staff, and law enforcement personnel across the state would receive mandated training guidelines and resources covering threat reporting, incident command, and legal authority limits.

Background
  • The revised school code is the primary compilation of Michigan statutes governing public primary and secondary education. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

School resource officers

They would receive position-specific training and coverage of legal updates regarding their authority in the school environment.

Directly affected

School personnel

Personnel with regular contact with pupils would receive materials on mandatory threat reporting protocols, confidential tip line processes, and emergency operations plans.

Directly affected

Nonpublic schools

Their governing bodies are explicitly granted the option to elect to exempt their schools from the requirements of the section.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is required to receive the new safety training resources under this bill?
The bill establishes training categories for school resource officers, crisis response team members, all school personnel with regular contact with pupils, and school safety and security personnel.
Can private or nonpublic schools choose not to participate?
Yes, the governing body of a nonpublic school may elect to exempt the nonpublic school from the requirements of this section.
Who develops the training materials regarding legal limits for school resource officers?
The Department of Attorney General is responsible for developing materials on legal updates concerning the limits and scope of an officer's authority in the school environment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. May 20, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
  2. May 20, 2025SenateFloor
    PASSED BY HOUSE WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT
  3. May 14, 2025House
    transmitted
  4. May 14, 2025HouseFloor
    passed; given immediate effect Roll Call #112 Yeas 82 Nays 24 Excused 0 Not Voting 4
  5. May 14, 2025HouseFloor
    substitute (H-3) adopted
  6. May 14, 2025HouseFloor
    read a third time
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. May 7, 2025House
    placed on third reading
  2. May 7, 2025HouseFloor
    substitute (H-2) adopted
  3. May 7, 2025HouseFloor
    read a second time
  4. Apr 30, 2025House
    referred to second reading
  5. Apr 30, 2025HouseCommittee
    reported with recommendation with substitute (H-2)
  6. Apr 17, 2025House
    bill electronically reproduced 04/16/2025
  7. Apr 16, 2025HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Education and Workforce
  8. Apr 16, 2025HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  9. Apr 16, 2025HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Joseph Pavlov

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedHouse5/14/2025Michigan LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

passed; given immediate effect Roll Call #112 Yeas 82 Nays 24 Excused 0 Not Voting 4

Total

105

Yes
82
No
23
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (105)

81 more members
Denise MentzerParty not recordedyes
David MartinParty not recordedyes
Joey AndrewsParty not recordedyes
Samantha SteckloffParty not recordedyes
Phil SkaggsParty not recordedno
Carol GlanvilleParty not recordedyes
Ron RobinsonParty not recordedyes
Brad SlaghParty not recordedyes
J.R. RothParty not recordedyes
Ranjeev PuriParty not recordedno
Rylee LintingParty not recordedyes
Tyrone CarterParty not recordedyes
Timmy BesonParty not recordedyes
Matt LongjohnParty not recordedyes
Jerry NeyerParty not recordedyes
Amos O'NealParty not recordedyes
Jason WoolfordParty not recordedyes
Nancy Jenkins-ArnoParty not recordedyes
Joe AragonaParty not recordedyes
Nancy DeBoerParty not recordedyes
Dave PrestinParty not recordedyes
Mike HoadleyParty not recordedyes
Matt BierleinParty not recordedyes
Cynthia NeeleyParty not recordedyes
Pat OutmanParty not recordedyes
Sharon MacDonellParty not recordedyes
Mai XiongParty not recordedyes
Helena ScottParty not recordedno
Jaime GreeneParty not recordedyes
Donavan McKinneyParty not recordedno
Steve FrisbieParty not recordedyes
Tim KellyParty not recordedyes
Tom KuhnParty not recordedyes
Stephanie YoungParty not recordedno
Kathy SchmaltzParty not recordedyes
Ann BollinParty not recordedyes
Kristian GrantParty not recordedno
Jason MorganParty not recordedno
Pauline WendzelParty not recordedyes
Jim DeSanaParty not recordedno
Greg VanWoerkomParty not recordedyes
Will SnyderParty not recordedyes
Luke MeermanParty not recordedyes
Gina JohnsenParty not recordedyes
Steve CarraParty not recordedno
Will BruckParty not recordedyes
Greg AlexanderParty not recordedyes
Mike McFallParty not recordedyes
Ken BortonParty not recordedyes
Tullio LiberatiParty not recordedyes
Josh SchriverParty not recordedno
Jamie ThompsonParty not recordedyes
Carrie RheingansParty not recordedno
Rachelle SmitParty not recordedyes
Laurie PohutskyParty not recordedno
Greg MarkkanenParty not recordedyes
Cam CavittParty not recordedyes
Stephen WoodenParty not recordedyes
Noah ArbitParty not recordedyes
Kelly BreenParty not recordedyes
Penelope TsernoglouParty not recordedyes
Natalie PriceParty not recordedno
Reggie MillerParty not recordedyes
Erin ByrnesParty not recordedyes
Joseph FoxParty not recordedyes
Kimberly EdwardsParty not recordedno
Emily DievendorfParty not recordedno
Parker FairbairnParty not recordedyes
Donni SteeleParty not recordedyes
Jennifer ConlinParty not recordedyes
Brian BeGoleParty not recordedyes
Phil GreenParty not recordedyes
Curt VanderWallParty not recordedyes
Morgan ForemanParty not recordedno
John FitzgeraldParty not recordedyes
Matt KoleszarParty not recordedyes
Brenda CarterParty not recordedyes
Alicia St. GermaineParty not recordedyes
Kara HopeParty not recordedno
Matt MaddockParty not recordedno
Karl BohnakParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Multi-agency coordination for school safety

The legislation formally divides training development duties across four distinct state entities based on their specialized jurisdictions.

Connected Entities

Department of Education, Office of School Safety, Department of State Police and 2 more
OrganizationDepartment of Education“Coordinates and develops mandatory threat reporting protocols”Map →
OrganizationOffice of School Safety“Develops school safety training materials and makes them publicly available”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of State Police“Develops school safety training materials and best practices”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Attorney General“Develops materials on legal updates and legal authority and limitations”Map →
OrganizationOK2Say program“State student safety program administering confidential safety tip lines”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record