POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Ohio Prohibits Law Enforcement From Charging Fees for Video Public Records Depicting Requesters

Original title: Prohibit law enforcement from charging fees for certain videos

Last action · February 26, 2025: Referred to JudiciarySponsors: Paula Hicks-Hudson and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

State and local law enforcement agencies are prohibited from charging any fee for preparing or producing a video for an individual who is known or presumed to be depicted in the video, or for their representative, spouse, parent, or child.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

individuals depicted in law enforcement video records

Individuals depicted in law enforcement videos are exempt from paying preparation and production fees when requesting those public records.

Directly affected

state or local law enforcement agencies

Law enforcement agencies are prohibited from charging fees for preparing or producing video public records for depicted individuals or their qualifying family members.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can law enforcement charge me for a copy of a video if I am in it?
No. Under SB 123, state and local law enforcement agencies cannot charge a fee for preparing or producing a video for a person known or presumed to be depicted in the video.
Does this fee waiver apply to family members of a person depicted in a video?
Yes, the prohibition on charging fees also applies when the requester is a representative, spouse, parent, or child of the individual depicted in the video.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 26, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary
  2. Feb 25, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Catherine Ingram, Paula Hicks-Hudson
PersonCatherine Ingram“Senator, District 9, cosponsor of SB 123”Map →
PersonPaula Hicks-Hudson“Senator, District 11, primary sponsor of SB 123”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record