POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Nevada Senate Bill 103 requires earlier mail-ballot postmark deadlines and mandatory clerk date stamping

Original title: AN ACT relating to elections; revising certain deadlines relating to the return of mail ballots; revising various requirements relating to mail ballots; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Last action · April 12, 2025: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)Sponsors: Lisa Krasner and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 103 requires mailed ballots for county and city elections to be postmarked on or before the last day of rather than election day, and received before the polls close on election day. The bill also mandates that county and city clerks date-mark any returned mail ballot that lacks a United States Postal Service postmark in order for it to be counted.

Why it matters

Voters face a tightened timeline to mail back their ballots, shifting the cutoff from election day to the end of , and unpostmarked hand-delivered or drop-box ballots now depend entirely on municipal date-stamping to remain valid.

Background
  • Nevada law permits voters to cast mail-in ballots in county and city elections under specific statutory guidelines. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

voters using mail ballots

Voters must meet an earlier postmark deadline tied to the end of early voting and ensure their ballots arrive before polls close on election day.

Directly affected

county and city clerks

Clerks are required to establish drop boxes at every polling place and implement procedures to date-mark ballots that lack a postal postmark.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

By when must a mail ballot be postmarked under this bill?
A mail ballot must be postmarked on or before the last day of the period for , rather than on election day.
What happens if a mail ballot does not have a postmark from the Postal Service?
The county or city clerk must have established procedures to date-mark the ballot with the date it was returned, and the ballot must contain either that clerk date mark or a postal postmark to be counted.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 12, 2025
    (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)
  2. Feb 3, 2025Introduced
    Read first time. To committee.
  3. Jan 22, 2025
    From printer.
  4. Jan 17, 2025Introduced
    Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. To printer.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Shift in Mail Ballot Postmark Requirements

The bill shifts the postmark eligibility deadline from election day to the end of early voting and eliminates the post-election grace period for un-postmarked ballots.

Connected Entities

Ira Hansen, Jeff Stone, Robin Titus and 3 more
PersonIra Hansen“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 103”Map →
PersonJeff Stone“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 103”Map →
PersonRobin Titus“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 103”Map →
PersonJohn Steinbeck“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 103”Map →
PersonLisa Krasner“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 103”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Postal Service“Provides postmarks for mail ballots”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.leg.state.nv.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record