POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana House Bill 978 Adjusts Population Threshold for Indigent Defender Fund Court Costs

Original title: INDIGENT DEFENSE: Changes the municipality threshold relative to the mandatory assessment and remittance of special costs to the district indigent defender fund

Last action · June 23, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsor: Jeremy LaCombe

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana enacted HB 978 to change the municipality population threshold for mandatory special cost assessments remitted to the district . The law modifies court fee exemptions for in municipalities based on population size. The measure takes effect on August 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Modifies financial remittance requirements for local courts, altering which municipalities must collect and forward forty-dollar special assessments to support indigent defense services.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Municipalities with populations between 5,000 and 9,000

Mayors' courts in these municipalities are newly exempted from remitting certain special costs to the district indigent defender fund.

Directly affected

District indigent defender funds

These funds experience changes in revenue collections based on the adjusted municipal population threshold for special cost remittances.

Directly affected

Defendants convicted in covered municipal courts

Subject to mandatory special cost assessments added to fines upon conviction depending on the municipality's population.

Key Facts

  • House Bill 978 amends and reenacts R.S. 15:168(B)(1)(a) regarding the judicial district indigent defender fund.
  • The law exempts mayors' courts in municipalities with a population of less than nine thousand from remitting specific special costs to the fund.
  • Previously, the exemption applied to municipalities having a population of less than five thousand.
  • Courts of original criminal jurisdiction must remit special costs for violations under state statute, parish ordinance, or municipal ordinance, excluding parking violations.
Show all 8 facts
  • A sum of forty-five dollars is assessed in cases where a defendant is convicted after a trial, guilty plea, nolo contendere, or bond forfeiture, in addition to other fines and costs.
  • The towns of Jonesville and Plaquemine remain specifically named as exempt from these remittance requirements.
  • The act became law without the Governor's signature as Act No. 930 of the 2026 Regular Session.
  • The effective date of the act is August 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which municipalities are exempt from remitting special costs to the indigent defender fund under the new law?
in municipalities with a population of less than nine thousand, as well as the town of Jonesville and the city of Plaquemine, are exempt.
What is the amount of the special cost assessed upon conviction?
The sum of forty-five dollars is assessed in applicable cases.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Became law without the governor's signature.

Procedural history

18 actions
  1. Jun 23, 2026House
    Becomes Act No. 930 without the Governor's signature.
  2. Jun 23, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. May 28, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  4. May 27, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
  5. May 27, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate.
  6. May 26, 2026SenateFloor
    Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
Show 12 earlier actions
  1. May 26, 2026House
    Received from the Senate without amendments.
  2. May 20, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  3. May 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  4. May 18, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably.
  5. May 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary B.
  6. Apr 29, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 92, nays 2. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  7. Apr 29, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Rules suspended. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  8. Apr 27, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  9. Apr 27, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/29/2026.
  10. Apr 23, 2026House
    Reported with amendments (12-0).
  11. Mar 18, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
  12. Mar 17, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title. Lies over under the rules.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jonesville, Plaquemine, Jeremy LaCombe
locationJonesville“Town explicitly exempted from remitting special costs to the district indigent d”Map →
locationPlaquemine“City explicitly exempted from remitting special costs to the district indigent d”Map →
PersonJeremy LaCombe“Representative who authored House Bill 978”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record