POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri Senate proposes constitutional amendment defining "person" to include unborn children and excluding abortion rights

Original title: Defines "person" in relation to the equal protection of laws

Last action · April 14, 2026: Voted Do Pass S Emerging Issues and Professional Registration CommitteeSponsor: Mike Moon

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Missouri voters will consider a at the November 2026 election that defines "person" under the state constitution to include every human being from conception onward and specifies that the constitution does not protect or fund abortion.

Why it matters

The measure alters the foundational legal definition of personhood in the Missouri Constitution, directly affecting future legal challenges and legislative policies regarding abortion and fetal rights.

Background
  • Senate Joint Resolution 72 is a legislative measure introduced in the Missouri General Assembly to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

qualified voters of Missouri

Voters will decide whether to adopt or reject the proposed constitutional amendment at the ballot box.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When will voters decide on this proposed constitutional amendment?
Voters will decide on the amendment at the general election on Tuesday next following the first Monday in November, 2026, or at a special election called by the governor.
Does the measure provide any state funding or cost for implementation?
No, the official states that the change is expected to have no fiscal impact.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Check Your Understanding

1.According to bill version 5127S.01I, what does the proposed text state regarding abortion rights and funding?

2.According to bill version 5127S.01I, when must the proposed constitutional amendment be submitted to the qualified voters of Missouri?

3.According to Senate Joint Resolution No. 72, how does the proposed text define the term "person" under the Missouri Constitution?

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    Voted Do Pass S Emerging Issues and Professional Registration Committee
  2. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Hearing Conducted S Emerging Issues and Professional Registration Committee
  3. Jan 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S Emerging Issues and Professional Registration Committee
  4. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read
  5. Dec 1, 2025Senate
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. The text on record is the 5127S.01I - Introduced version. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference95% confidence

Identical Previous Measures

The official summary notes that this constitutional amendment is identical to SJR 8 from 2025 and HJR 89 from 2024.

Connected Entities

Missouri, Kristina Martin, Mike Moon and 1 more
locationMissouri“state where the constitutional amendment is submitted to voters”Map →
PersonKristina Martin“Secretary of the Senate”Map →
PersonMike Moon“Senator who introduced Senate Joint Resolution No. 72”Map →
PersonSarah Haskins“Author/signer noted in official metadata”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record