POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota House Bill 561 authorizes police use of drones to find missing and fleeing individuals

Original title: Law enforcement use of unmanned aerial vehicles to find missing persons, persons fleeing arrest, and incarcerated persons authorized.

Last action · March 13, 2025: Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Public Safety Finance and PolicySponsor: Duane Quam

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Minnesota law enforcement agencies are authorized to use s to search for missing persons, locate individuals actively fleeing arrest, and track escaped incarcerated persons under HF 561.

Why it matters

Expands the legal circumstances under which police departments may deploy aerial drones without requiring an emergency warrant or prior judicial approval.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

law enforcement agency

Law enforcement agencies gain explicit legal authorization to deploy unmanned aerial vehicles for missing persons searches, active pursuits, and prison escapes.

Directly affected

missing person

Missing individuals, including missing children and vulnerable adults, may be searched for using aerial drone technology.

Directly affected

incarcerated person

Incarcerated individuals escaping from adult correctional facilities may be tracked by law enforcement using drones.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can police use drones to search for missing children under this bill?
Yes, the bill explicitly authorizes law enforcement agencies to use s to provide expansive aerial coverage for searching for missing persons, including missing children and vulnerable adults.
Does the bill permit drone use during an active police pursuit?
Yes, law enforcement may use drones to locate a person sought for arrest when the individual has fled from an officer and the officer remains in active pursuit.
Are prison escapes covered under the new drone authorizations?
Yes, police or authorized personnel can use drones to locate an incarcerated person escaping from an adult correctional facility under the control of or licensed by the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 13, 2025HouseCommittee
    Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Public Safety Finance and Policy
  2. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Transportation Finance and Policy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Minnesota, Duane Quam, Commissioner of Corrections and 2 more
locationMinnesota“State jurisdiction where the bill applies”Map →
PersonDuane Quam“Author of the bill”Map →
PersonCommissioner of Corrections“Official controlling or licensing adult correctional facilities”Map →
OrganizationMinnesota Senate“Legislative body for state laws”Map →
OrganizationMinnesota House of Representatives“Legislative body originating the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record