POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

North Carolina Replaces Full Mental Health Records Disclosure for Concealed Handgun Permits with Simple Yes/No Statements

Original title: CCW Permit/No Records Provided.

Last action · April 8, 2025: Re-ref Com On Health (House action)Sponsors: Keith Kidwell and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina House Bill 427 eliminates the requirement for applicants to authorize full disclosure of their mental health records to the sheriff. Instead, health providers and entities will only submit a "Yes" or "No" statement indicating whether they possess information of a mental illness diagnosis, effective October 1, 2025.

Why it matters

The measure limits the personal health information shared during background checks for s by replacing full medical record access with a binary confirmation.

Background
  • Concealed handgun permits in North Carolina are issued by county sheriffs after applicants meet specific background and training criteria set by state law. context
  • House Bill 427 was introduced in the North Carolina General Assembly for the 2025-2026 session by primary sponsor Representative Kidwell. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Concealed Handgun Permit Applicants

Directly affected

Sheriffs

Sheriffs must request mental health statements within 10 days of receiving an application, process permit determinations within 45 days, and include specific respondent details in any denial notices.

Directly affected

Medical and Mental Health Providers

Providers are required to respond to sheriffs with a "Yes" or "No" statement regarding mental illness diagnoses, and must provide written grounds to the applicant within 15 days if they answer "Yes".

Key Facts

  • Entities or persons queried must respond with a "Yes" or "No" statement indicating whether they have information that the applicant has been diagnosed by a medical professional with a mental illness.
  • If an entity responds "Yes", it must provide the applicant with the grounds for responding "Yes" in writing within 15 days of providing the statement to the sheriff.
  • Entities responding with a statement are protected from civil liability for damages if the statement is inaccurate, in the absence of fraud or malice.
  • The bill explicitly states that nothing in the new subsection requires the actual disclosure of underlying records to the sheriff.
Show all 9 facts
  • Sheriffs must make requests for the mental health statement within 10 days of receiving a complete application, and issue or deny the permit within 45 days.
  • No person, company, mental health provider, or governmental entity may charge additional fees to the applicant for background checks conducted under this provision.
  • If a permit is denied, the written notice must identify any person or entity who provided a statement, specify whether they answered "Yes" or "No", and provide their contact information.
  • The Administrative Office of the Courts must update the required release form no later than September 30, 2025.
  • The act applies to concealed handgun permit applications submitted on or after October 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a medical provider or entity answers "Yes" to having mental health information about an applicant?
If an entity responds "Yes", it must provide the applicant with the specific grounds for that response in writing within 15 days of providing the statement to the sheriff.
Does the sheriff still receive the applicant's actual mental health records under this bill?
No. The bill explicitly specifies that nothing in the subsection requires the disclosure of actual records to the sheriff, replacing full record access with a simple "Yes" or "No" statement.
Can providers or entities charge a fee to the applicant for conducting these background checks?
No person, company, mental health provider, or governmental entity may charge additional fees to the applicant for background checks conducted under this provision.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 8, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Health
  2. Apr 8, 2025House
    Reptd Fav Com Substitute
  3. Mar 19, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, Health, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  4. Mar 19, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  5. Mar 18, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Transition from Full Record Access to Binary Disclosure

The bill shifts state concealed carry background checks away from full mental health records release toward a limited yes/no confirmation model.

Connected Entities

Administrative Office of the Courts, National Instant Criminal Background Check System, North Carolina
OrganizationAdministrative Office of the Courts“Responsible for updating the release form by September 30, 2025”Map →
OrganizationNational Instant Criminal Background Check System“System for submitting involuntary commitment information”Map →
locationNorth Carolina“Jurisdiction enacting the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy70
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record