POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Arizona Senate proposes constitutional amendment establishing a resident right to a clean environment

Original title: environment; constitutional amendment

Last action · January 28, 2026: Senate Second ReadingSponsors: Lauren Kuby and 12 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

SCR 1017 proposes a constitutional amendment to establish an inherent and inalienable right to clean air, water, ecosystems, and a safe climate for present and future generations, subject to voter approval at the next general election.

Why it matters

If approved by voters, the state government and local subdivisions would be legally mandated to serve as trustees of natural resources and prioritize safe climate systems and renewable energy.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Arizona residents

Gain a constitutional right to clean air, water, healthy ecosystems, and a safe climate.

Directly affected

State of Arizona and political subdivisions

Must serve as trustees of natural resources and prioritize secure climate systems and renewable energy.

Key Facts

  • The measure proposes adding Section 38 to Article II of the Constitution of Arizona.
  • Each person is declared to have an inherent and inalienable right to clean water, clean air, healthy ecosystems, a safe climate, and environmental preservation.
  • Environmental rights belong to both present and future generations.
  • The state and political subdivisions must protect these rights and cannot infringe on them.
Show all 9 facts
  • Natural resources including waters, air, flora, fauna, and climate are designated as common property of all people.
  • The state and political subdivisions must serve as trustees of natural resources and conserve them.
  • Securing a safe and stable climate system and providing clean, renewable, and safe energy is declared a compelling state interest.
  • The constitutional provisions are self-executing.
  • The Secretary of State is required to submit the proposition to voters at the next general election.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does SCR 1017 do?
It proposes amending the Arizona Constitution to guarantee a right to a clean and healthy environment and mandates that the state protect natural resources.
Who does this proposed amendment apply to?
It applies to all present and future generations in Arizona, as well as the state government and its s.
When would this amendment take effect?
It requires approval by voters at the next general election and subsequent proclamation by the Governor.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 28, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Second Reading
  2. Jan 27, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

State of Arizona
locationState of Arizona“Governing body responsible for natural resources and constitutional amendments.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record