POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Ban on Military Purchases Made with Child Labor

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6258

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senator Schatz has introduced an amendment to the 2027 defense budget bill that would prohibit the Department of Defense from using federal funds to purchase products made with . The proposal requires contractors to certify they have made a good-faith effort to ensure their products are not manufactured using such labor.

Why it matters

This amendment would establish a new legal requirement for Department of Defense contractors to certify their supply chains are free of , affecting all companies seeking to provide goods to the military in 2027.

Background
  • S. 4784 is the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which sets the budget and policy priorities for the Department of Defense. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Department of Defense contractors

These entities must provide certifications regarding their labor practices to be eligible for Department of Defense contracts.

Directly affected

Department of Defense

The agency is prohibited from spending funds on products made with oppressive child labor and must establish new procurement rules.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this amendment change for defense contractors?
Contractors would be required to certify that they have made a good-faith effort to ensure that no is used in the performance of their contracts with the Department of Defense.
How is 'oppressive child labor' defined?
The amendment uses the definition already established in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Supply Chain Compliance

The amendment signals a move toward stricter labor-related certification requirements for federal defense contractors.

Connected Entities

Department of Defense, Department of Labor, Mr. Schatz and 1 more
OrganizationDepartment of Defense“The agency subject to the procurement prohibition and rulemaking requirements.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Labor“The agency required to consult on the rulemaking process.”Map →
PersonMr. Schatz“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
otherFair Labor Standards Act of 1938“The statute providing the legal definition for 'oppressive child labor'.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record