POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 1395 extends vehicle rental definitions to 180 days and mandates damage waiver refunds for early returns

Original title: Relating to the regulation of private passenger vehicle rental companies.

Last action · May 5, 2025: Laid on the table subject to callSponsor: John Lujan

Companion · SB 72same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 1395 extends the maximum duration for private passenger vehicle rental agreements and rental company definitions from 30 to 180 days, and requires rental companies to issue partial refunds for unused charges when vehicles are returned early or the waiver is canceled without damage.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Vehicle renters

Renters gain the right to receive refunds for unused damage waiver charges if they return vehicles early or cancel waivers on undamaged vehicles.

Directly affected

Private passenger vehicle rental companies

Rental companies must adjust their contract lengths up to 180 days and implement refund procedures for early damage waiver terminations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is a renter entitled to a refund on a damage waiver?
A renter is entitled to a refund if they return the vehicle before the anticipated return date, or if they cancel the before that date and the rental company confirms the vehicle was not damaged prior to cancellation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Tabled in the House.

Procedural history

19 actions
  1. May 5, 2025House
    Laid on the table subject to call
  2. May 5, 2025House
    Companion considered in lieu of (CSSB 72)
  3. May 5, 2025House
    Placed on General State Calendar
  4. May 2, 2025House
    Considered in Calendars
  5. Apr 28, 2025House
    Considered in Calendars
  6. Apr 2, 2025House
    Committee report sent to Calendars
Show 13 earlier actions
  1. Apr 1, 2025House
    Committee report distributed
  2. Apr 1, 2025House
    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  3. Mar 26, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably as substituted
  4. Mar 26, 2025House
    Committee substitute considered in committee
  5. Mar 26, 2025House
    Considered in public hearing
  6. Mar 19, 2025House
    Left pending in committee
  7. Mar 19, 2025House
    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  8. Mar 19, 2025House
    Committee substitute considered in committee
  9. Mar 19, 2025House
    Considered in public hearing
  10. Mar 19, 2025House
    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  11. Mar 11, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
  12. Mar 11, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  13. Nov 19, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Business & Commerce Code, Occupations Code
OrganizationBusiness & Commerce Code“Chapters 91 amended by the bill”Map →
OrganizationOccupations Code“Chapter 2301 licenses excluded from rental company definition”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record